Revisiting classification and identification

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 100-102

  Keogh, Barbara K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18944403953     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1593603     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Bradley, R., Danielson, L., & Hallahan, D. P. (Eds.). (2002). Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (2000). What definitions of learning disability say and don't say. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 239-256.
3. Swanson, H. L. (2002). Learning disabilities is a specific processing deficit, but it is much more than phonological processing. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 643-651). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Torgesen, J. K. (2002). Empirical and theoretical support for direct diagnosis of learning disabilities by assessment of intrinsic processing weaknesses. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 565-613). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. U.S. Department of Education. (1977). Nineteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
6. Zigler, E., & Phillips, L. (1961). Psychiatric diagnosis: A critique. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 607-618.