VeriAgent: An approach to integrating UML and formal verification tools

Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science

Volumn 95, Issue , 2004, Pages 111-129

  Mota, E ^a   Clarke, E ^b   Groce, A ^b   Oliveira, W ^a   Falcao M ^a   Kanda, J ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF AMAZONAS   (Brazil)

^b Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

Transformation; Verification Agent; Verification Tool

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; FORMAL LANGUAGES; GRAPHIC METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; SEMANTICS; SPECIFICATIONS; USER INTERFACES;

CONSTRAINT LANGUAGES; FORMAL VERIFICATION TOOLS (FVT); VERIFICATION AGENTS; VERIFICATION TOOLS;

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 18944396424     PISSN: 15710661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.entcs.2004.04.008     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Cimatti A., Clarke F., Giunchiglia E., Pistore M., Roveri M., Sebastiani R., Tachella A. NuSMV 2: An open source tool for symbolic model checking. Computer Aided Verification. 2002
2. Clarke, E. and W. Heinle, Modular translation of statecharts to smv, Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University (2000)
3. Clarke E.M., Wing J.M., et al. Formal methods: State of art and future directions. AC Computing Surveys. 28:1996;626-643
4. Compton, K., Y. Gurevich, J. Huggins and W. Shen, An automatic verification tool for UML, CSE 423-00, Michigan University (2000)
5. Dennis A., Wixon B.H., Tegarden D. Systems Analysis & Design: An Object Oriented Approach with UML. 2002;John Wiley & Sons, INc
6. Evans A., France R., Lano K., Rumpe B. Meta-modeling semantics of uml. http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/puml/papers/pumluml99.pdf:1999;. computer Science Department - University of York
7. Falcão, M., J. Leite, D. Gonzales, M. Souza and D. Lima, Uma extensão do ArgoUML para verificação formal, Technical Report 2, Universidade Federal do Amazonas (2003), EsVIA/CNPq Grant 550730/01-0
8. Gabbay D. Fibring Logics. 1999;Oxford University Press
9. Groce A., Visser W. What went wrong: Explaining counterexamples. SPIN Workshop on Model Checking of Software. 2003;121-135
10. Holt A. Formal verification with natural language specifications: guidelines, experiments and lessons so far. South African Computer Journal. 24:1999;253-257
11. Lewis D. Causation. Journal of Philosophy. 70:1973;556-567
12. Lilius, J. and I. P. Paltor, vuml: a tool for verifying uml models, Technical report, Abo Akademi University (1999)
13. Lloyd J. Foundations of Logic Programming. 1993;Springer Verlag
14. Manna Z., Pnueli A. The Temporal Logic of Reactive and Concurrent Systems. 1991;Springer Verlag
15. Mota E. Cyclical and granular time theories as subsets of the herbrand universe. Principles of Knowldege Representation and Reasoning. 2000;366-377
16. OMG, Omg xml metadata exchange specification. URL www.omg.org:2002;. acessed on October 2002
17. Russel S., Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 1995;Prentice Hall
18. Schumann J. Automated Theorem Proving in Software Engineering. 2001;Springer Verlag