Enhancement of electrokinetic remediation for tetrachloroethylene contaminated clay by Fe(0) reaction barrier

Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association's Annual Meeting and Exhibition

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 5809-5822

  Yuan, Ching ^a   Weng, Chih Huang ^b   Hung, Chung Hsuang ^c  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF KAOHSIUNG   (Taiwan)

^b I SHOU UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL KAOHSIUNG UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Electrokinetic; Permeable reaction barrier; Sil remediation; Zero valent iron

Indexed keywords

ANODES; CATHODES; CONTAMINATION; ELECTROOSMOSIS; ETHYLENE; GLASS; IRON; PH EFFECTS; PRECIPITATION (CHEMICAL); REACTION KINETICS; SOILS;

ELECTROKINETIC (EK) REMEDIATION; PERMEABLE REACTION BARRIERS; SIL REMEDIATION; TETRACHLOROETHYLENE; ZERO VALENT IRON;

CLAY;

EID: 18944395114     PISSN: 10526102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Li, Z.; Yu, J. W.; Neretnieks I. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997, 32, 394-404.
2. Pamukcu, S.; Weeks, A.; Wittle, J. K. J. Hazard. Mater. 1997, 55, 305-405.
3. th International Confetrence on the Biochemistry of Trace Element, Vienna, Austria, July 11-15, 1999; 994-995.
4. Shapiro, A. P.; Probstein, R. F. Removal of Contaminants from Saturated Clay by Electroosmosis; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1993, 27(2), 283-291.
5. st Century: Pollution Control and Reclamation in Process Industrial, IAWQ, Beijing, Sept. 18-20, 2000; 754-761
6. Weng, C. H.; Yuan, C. Removal of Cr(III) from Clay by Electrokinetics; Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2001, 23, 281-285.
7. Bruell, C.; Segall, B. A.; Walsh, M. T. Electro-Osmotic Removal of Gasoline Hydrocarbons and TCE from Clay; J. Environ. Engr. 1992, 118(1), 68-83.
8. rd Waste Treatment Technology Conference, 197-204.
9. rd Waste Treatment Technology Conference, Taiwan, 1998; 189-196.
10. Bull, R. A.; Zeff, J. D.; Eckenfelder, W. W.; Bowers, A. R.; Roth J. A. Eds. Cemical Oxidation; Technomic Publishing Company, Inc., Lancaster, PA, 1992; pp.26-36.
11. Arnold, W.; Roberts, A. L. Pathways and kinetics of chlorinated ethylene and chlorinated acetylene reaction with Fe(0) particles; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 34, 2850-2860.
12. Puls, R. W.; Powell, R. M.; Paul, C. J. In Situ Remediation of Ground Water Contaminated with Chromate and Chlorinated Solvent Using Zero Valent Iron: A field Study; National Meeting of American Chemical Society, Div. Environ. Chem., 1995, 35, 788-791.
13. Ho, S. A.; Athmer, C.; Sheridan, P. W.; Hughes, B. M.; Orth, R.; Mckenzie, D.; Brodsky, P. H.; Shapiro, A. M.; Sivavec, T. M.; Salvo, J.; Schultz, D.; Landis, R.; Griffith, R; Shoemaker, S. The Lasagna, Technology for In Situ Soil Remediation. 2. Large Field Test; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33(7), 1092-1099.
14. rd Waste Treatment Technology Conference, Taiwan, 2000; 7-8-7-13.
15. nd Ed., American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA, 1982; pp.539-579.
16. Bouwer, H. Groundwater Hydrology. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, USA, 1993; pp.38-39.
17. Li, A. K.; Cheung, A.; Reddy, K. R. Cosolvent-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of soils contaminated with phenanthrene; J. Environ. Eng. 2000, 126(6), 527-533.
18. Reddy, K. R.; ASCE, M.; Saichek, R. E. Effect of soil type on electrokinetic removal of phenanthrene using surfactants and cosolvents; J. Enviro. Eng. 2003, 129(4), 336-346
19. Langeman, R. Electroreclamation: applications in the Netherlands; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994, 27, 2648-2650.
20. 0; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30(1), 66-71.