Detoxifying ecological risk assessment

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 469-472

  Tannenbaum, Lawrence V ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18944391962     PISSN: 10807039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10807030590927658     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. Borgert CJ. 2004. Chemical mixtures: An unsolvable riddle? Hum Ecol Risk Assess 10:619-29
2. Sample BE, Opresko DM, and Suter GW. 1996. Toxicological Benchmarks for Wildlife: 1996 Revision. ES/ER/TM-86/R3. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
3. Sorenson MT, Gala WR, and Margolin, JA. 2004. Approaches to ecological risk characterization and management: Selecting the right tools for the job. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 10:245-69
4. Tannenbaum LV, Johnson MS, and Bazar M. 2003a. Application of the hazard quotient method in remedial decisions: A comparison of human and ecological risk assessments. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 9:387-401
5. Tannenbaum LV, Bazar M, Hawkins M, et al. 2003b. Rodent sperm analysis in field-based ecological risk assessment: Pilot study at Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant, Ravenna, Ohio. Envir Poll 123:21-9
6. Tannenbaum LV. 2005. A critical assessment of the ecological risk assessment process: A review of misapplied concepts. Integrated Environ Assess Manage 1:66-72
7. USACHPPM (US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine). 2003. Wildlife Toxicity Assessment Program. Available at http://chppm-www.apgea. army.mil/erawg/tox/index.htm