Perspectives on applications of technology in the field of learning disabilities

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 175-178

  Blackhurst, A Edward ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18944386688     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1593622     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (1995). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (4th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
2. Ashton, T. (2005). Students with learning disabilities using assistive technology in the inclusive classroom. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 229-238). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design, Inc.
3. Batshaw, M. L., & Perret, Y. M. (1992). Children with disabilities: A medical primer. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
4. Bausch, M. E. (1999). A comparison of standard computer keyboard input to alternate keyboard input when using the constant time delay response prompting procedure during computerized mathematics instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
5. Blackhurst, A. E. (1965). Technology in special education - some implications. Exceptional Children, 31, 449-456.
6. Blackhurst, A. E. (1967). Tachistoscopic training as a supplement to reading instruction for educable mentally retarded children. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 2, 121-125.
7. Blackhurst, A. E. (1997). Perspectives on technology in special education. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 29(5), 41-48.
8. Blackhurst, A. E. (2001). Designing technology professional development programs. In A. Woodward & E. Cuban (Eds.), Technology, curriculum and professional development: Adapting schools to meet the needs of students with disabilities (pp. 138-186). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
9. Blackhurst, A. E. (2002). Case study on the integration of instruction about technology into a special education teacher preparation program. Available online at http://natri.uky.edu/resources/reports/caseihe.html
10. Blackhurst, A. E. (2005). Historical perspectives about technology applications for people with disabilities. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 1-27). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design, Inc.
11. Blackhurst, A. E., & Edyburn, D. L. (2000). A brief history of special education technology. Special Education Technology Practice, 2(1), 21-35.
12. Blackhurst, A. E., & Hofmeister, A. M. (1980). Technology in special education. In L. Mann & D. Sabatino (Eds.), Fourth review of special education (pp. 199-228). New York: Grune and Stratton.
13. Blackhurst, A. E., & Lahm, E. A. (in press). Foundations of technology and exceptionality. In J. Lindsey (Ed.), Technology and exceptional individuals (4th ed.) Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
14. Bowser, G., & Reed, P. R. (1995). Education TECH points for assistive technology planning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12(4), 325-338
15. Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., & Kameenui, E. J. (1990). Direct instruction in reading (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
16. Chambers, A. C. (1997). Has technology been considered? A guide for IEP teams. Albuquerque, NM: The Council of Administrators of Special Education, Inc.
17. Commission on Instructional Technology. (1970). To improve learning: A report to the President and the Congress of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18. Cook, A. M., & Hussey, S. M. (2002). Assistive technology: Principles and practices (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
19. Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1986). Learning strategies: An instructional alternative for low-achieving adolescents. Exceptional Children, 52(6), 583-590.
20. Edyburn, D. L. (2004). Assisted learning: How assistive technologies developed for people with disabilities will affect learning for everyone. Available online at http://www.ciconline.com/NR/rdonlyres/ ewckxfdtqyiyogmjg62et3xaxg4fgtzjtj6r4igavs32flt5a2jc2y 6jtfqzxnckaegy2jrn4qf5apkimaarui55flc/T-Sum-04-AssistedLearning.pdf
21. Edyburn, D. L. (2005). Assistive technology for students with mild disabilities: From consideration to outcome measurement. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 239-269). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design, Inc.
22. Hasselbring, T. S. (1996). Read 180. Available online at http://teacher.scholastic.com/products/read180/
23. Lewis, R. B. (1993). Special education technology: Classroom applications. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
24. Lewis, R. B. (2005). Classroom technology for students with learning disabilities. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 325-334). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design, Inc.
25. Lindsey, J. D. (Ed.). (in press). Technology & exceptional individuals (4th ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
26. Majsterek, D., & Edyburn, D. L. (Eds.). (1993). Special education technology applications for individuals with learning disabilities [Special issue]. LD Forum, 19(1).
27. Okolo, C. M. (2000). Technology for individuals with mild disabilities. In J. Lindsey (Ed.), Technology and exceptional individuals (3rd ed., pp. 243-301). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
28. Rose, D., & Meyer, A. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(1), 67-70.
29. Warfield, G. J. (Ed.). (1968). Special feature issue: The special education IMC/RMC network. Exceptional Children, 35, 315-317.
30. Wile, D. (1996). Why doers do. Performance and Instruction, 35(2), 30-35.
31. Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Doyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities: Use of response prompting procedures. White Plains, NY: Longman.
32. Wolery, M., Bailey, D. B., & Sugai, G. M. (1988). Effective teaching: Principles of applied behavior analysis with exceptional students. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
33. Zabala, J. (1995). The SETT framework: Critical issues to consider when making informed assistive technology decisions (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 381 962)
34. Zabala, J. (2002). Get SETT for successful inclusion and transition. Available at http://www.ldonline.org/ld_indepth/technology/zabalaSETT1.html