Coordinated distributed diagram transformation for software evolution

Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science

Volumn 72, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 59-70

  Bottoni, Paolo ^a   Parisi Presicce, Francesco ^a   Taentzer, Gabriele ^b  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; GRAPH THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; METADATA; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING;

EXTREME PROGRAMMING; GRAPH TRANSFORMATIONS; INPUT/OUTPUT MAPPING; UML PROGRAMS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 18944371996     PISSN: 15710661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1571-0661(04)80626-1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Appel A.W. "Modern Compiler Implementation in Java," 1998;Cambridge University Press
2. Beck K., Fowler M. "Planning Extreme Programming," 2001;Addison Wesley
3. Bottoni P., Koch M., Parisi-Presicce F., Taentzer G. Automatic consistency checking and visualization of ocl constraints. Evans A., Kent S. UML 2000 - The Unified Modeling Language. 2000;294-308
4. Engels G., Andries M., Rekers J. How to represent a visual specification. Marriott K., Meyer B. Visual Language Theory. 1998;245-260 Springer
5. Fowler M., Beck K., Brant J., Opdyke W., Roberts D. "Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code," 1999;Addison Wesley
6. Goedicke M., B. Enders, T. Meyer and G. Taentzer, Towards integration of multiple perspectives by distributed graph transformation, in: M. Nagl, A. Schürr and M. Münch, editors, Proc. AGTIVE 1999, 2000, pp. 369-377
7. Goedicke M., T. Meyer and G. Taentzer, Viewpoint-oriented software development by distributed graph transformation: Towards a basis for living with inconsistencies, in: Proc. 4th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, 1999, pp. 92-99
8. Koch M. and F. Parisi-Presicce, Describing policies with graph constraints and rules, in: Proc. ICGT02, to appear, 2002
9. Kreowski H., Kuske S.-J., Schürr A. Nested graph transformation units. Int. J. on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. 7:1997;479-502
10. Mens T. Conditional graph rewriting as a domain-independent formalism for software evolution. Nagl M., Schuerr A., Muench M. Applications of Graph Transformation with Industrial Relevance. 1999;127-143
11. Mens T., S. Demeyer and D. Janssens, Formalising behaviour preserving program transformations, in: Proc. ICGT 2002 (2002), to appear
12. nd Workshop on Soft Computing Applied to Software Engineering (2001)
13. OMG, UML specification version 1.4, http://www.omg.org/technology/ documents/formal/uml.htm (2001)
14. Opdyke, W. F., "Refactoring Object-Oriented Frameworks," Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1992)
15. Roberts, D. B., "Practical Analysis for Refactoring," Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois (1999)
16. Sunyé, G., I. Pollet, Y. L. Traon, and J.-M. Jézé quel, Refactoring UML models, in: M. Gogolla and C. Kobryn, editors, UML 2001 - The Unified Modeling Language. Modeling Languages, Concepts, and Tools. 4th International Conference (2001), pp. 134-148
17. Taentzer G., Fischer I., Koch M., Volle V. Visual Design of Distributed Systems by Graph Transformation. Ehrig H., Kreowski H.-J., Montanari U., Rozenberg G. Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation, Volume 3: Concurrency, Parallelism, and Distribution. 1999;269-340