Kondo effect in a metal with correlated conduction electrons: Diagrammatic approach

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 351141-3511414

  Neef, M ^a   Tornow, S ^a,c   Zevin, V ^b   Zwicknagl, G ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^c Institute for Bioinformatics   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METAL;

ARTICLE; CONDUCTANCE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; ELEMENTARY PARTICLE; ENERGY; LOW TEMPERATURE PROCEDURES; MAGNETISM; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE;

EID: 18844477568     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. A. M. Tsvelick and P. B. Wiegmann, Adv. Phys. 32, 453 (1983).
2. N. Andrei, K. Furuya, and J. H. Lowenstein, Rev. Mod. Phys. 55, 331 (1983).
3. P. Fulde, J. Keller, and G. Zwicknagl, in Solid State Physics, edited by F. Seitz, D. Tumbull, and H. Ehrenreich (Academic Press, New York, 1988), Vol. 41, p. 1.
4. G. Zwicknagl, Adv. Phys. 41, 203 (1992).
5. A. C. Hewson, The Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1993).
6. D. H. Lee and J. Toner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3378 (1992).
7. A. Furusaki and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 892 (1994).
8. A. Schiller and K. Ingersent, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 4676 (1995).
9. Y. M. Li, Phys. Rev. B 52, R6979 (1995).
10. P. Phillips and N. Sandler, Phys. Rev. B 53, 468 (1996).
11. A. Schiller and K. Ingersent, Europhys. Lett. 39, 645 (1997).
12. B. Davidovich and V. Zevin, Phys. Rev. B 57, 7773 (1998).
13. W. Hofstetter, R. Bulla, and D. Vollhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4417 (2000).
14. W. K. A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996).
15. R. Takayama, O. Sakai, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 1844 (1998).
16. G. Khaliullin and P. Fulde, Phys. Rev. B 52, 9514 (1995).
17. T. Schork, Phys. Rev. B 53, 5626 (1996).
18. K. Itai and P. Fazekas, Phys. Rev. B 54, R752 (1996).
19. S. Tomow, V. Zevin, and G. Zwicknagl, cond-mat/9701137 (unpublished).
20. T. A. Costi and A. Newns, Physica C 185-189, 2649 (1991).
21. R. Takayama and O. Sakai, Physica B 186-188, 915 (1993).
22. I. E. Perakis, C. M. Varma, and A. E. Ruckenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3467 (1993).
23. T. Giamarchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3967 (1993).
24. J. K. A. Bauer, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 96, 383 (1995).
25. The nondegenerate case may evolve from the orbital degenerate case as the consequence of the crystal electric-field splitting.
26. N. E. Bickers, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 845 (1987).
27. A. Bringer and H. Lustfeld, Z. Phys. B 28, 213 (1977).
28. P. Fulde, Electron Correlations in Molecules and Solids, 3rd ed. (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1995), and references therein.
29. P. Fazekas, Electron Correlations and Magnetism (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999), and references therein.
30. P. Coleman, Phys. Rev. B 29, 3035 (1984).
31. S. Tomow, Ph.D. thesis, U Stuttgart, 1997.
32. J. Hubbard, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 281, 401 (1964).
33. L. Roth, Phys. Rev. 184, 451 (1969).
34. →).
35. As it is known from the NCA method, Eq. (30) is the first step in the NCA iteration procedure (see Ref. 26) which already captures right the exponent of the Kondo energetic scale.
36. One has have in mind that Eq. (49) is strictly speaking applied for the bubble of Fig. 1(a). For Fig. 1(c) σ changes sign "across" interaction U.
37. (1)), correspondingly.
38. (1).
39. The influence of residual interactions of Fermi liquid quasiparticles on the Kondo effect may be interesting for the case of nearly ferromagnetic metals (unpublished).
40. A. Chubukov, D. Pines, and J. Schmalian, cond-mat/0201140 (unpublished), and references therein.
41. O. K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B 12, 3060 (1975).
42. H. Skriver, The LMTO Method, Springer Series in Solid State Sciences, Vol. 41 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984).