Concentrations of suspended chlorophyll in the tidal Yorkshire Ouse and Humber Estuary

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 210-211, Issue , 1998, Pages 367-375

  Uncles, R J ^a   Easton, A E ^a   Griffiths, M L ^a   Harris, C ^a   Howland, R J M ^a   Joint, I ^a   King, R S ^a   Morris, A W ^a   Plummer, D H ^a  

^a NATURAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chlorophyll a; Humber Estuary; Phaeopigments; Salinity; Suspended particulate matter; Yorkshire Ouse

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPHYLL; FRESH WATER; PIGMENT; SODIUM CHLORIDE; WATER;

CHLOROPHYLL; ESTUARY; RIVER WATER QUALITY; SALINITY; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER; TIDAL RIVER;

ARTICLE; ESTUARY; GROWTH RATE; MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIVER; SEASONAL VARIATION; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER;

UK, ENGLAND, HUMBER ESTUARY; UK, ENGLAND, OUSE RIVER;

EID: 18844464945     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00024-2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alpine A.E., Cloern J.E. Trophic interactions and direct physical effects control phytoplankton biomass and production in an estuary. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37:1992;946-955.
2. Cloern J.E. Tidal stirring and phytoplankton bloom dynamics in an estuary. J. Mar. Res. 49:1991;203-221.
3. Cloern J.E. Phytoplankton bloom dynamics in coastal ecosystems: a review with some general lessons from sustained investigation of San Francisco Bay California. Rev. Geophys. 34:1996;127-168.
4. Cloern J.E., Cole B.E., Wong R.L., Alpine A.E. Temporal dynamics of estuarine phytoplankton: a case study of San Francisco Bay. Hydrobiologia. 129:1985;153-176.
5. Dunstan W.M., Moon C.H. The chlorophyll peak in turbid very low salinity estuarine waters. J. Phycol. 24(suppl.):1988;13.
6. Dustan P., Pinckney J.L. Tidally induced estuarine phytoplankton patchiness. Limnol. Oceanogr. 34:1989;410-419.
7. Fichez R., Jickells T.D., Edmunds H.M. Algal blooms in high turbidity, a result of the conflicting consequences of turbulence on nutrient cycling in a shallow water estuary. Estuar. Coast Shelf Sci. 35:1992;577-592.
8. Filardo M.J., Dunstan W.M. Hydrodynamic control of phytoplankton in low salinity waters of the James River Estuary Virginia, USA. Estuar. Coast Shelf Sci. 21:1985;653-667.
9. Jackson R.H., LeB Williams P.J., Joint I.R. Freshwater phytoplankton in the low salinity region of the River Tamar Estuary. Estuar. Coast Shelf Sci. 25:1987;299-311.
10. Joint I.R., Pomroy A.J. Primary production in a turbid estuary. Estuar. Coast Shelf Sci. 13:1981;303-316.
11. Joint I., Pomroy A. Phytoplankton biomass and production in the southern North Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 99:1993;169-182.
12. Kromkamp J., Peene J., Van-Rijswijk P., Sandee A., Goosen N. Nutrients, light and primary production by phytoplankton and microphytobenthos in the eutrophic, turbid Westerschelde Estuary (The Netherlands). Hydrobiologia. 311:1995;9-19.
13. Leeks G.J.L., Jarvie H.P. Introduction to the Land-Ocean Interaction Study (LOIS): Rationale and international context. Sci. Total Environ. 210/211:1998;5-20.
14. Lewitus A.J., Kana T.M. Responses of estuarine phytoplankton to exogenous glucose: Stimulation versus inhibition of photosynthesis and respiration. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39:1994;182-189.
15. Mallin M.A., Paerl H.W. Effects of variable irradiance on phytoplankton productivity in shallow estuaries. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37:1992;54-62.
16. Malone T.C., Crocker L.H., Pike S.E., Wendler B.W. Influence of river flow on the dynamics of phytoplankton production in a partially stratified estuary. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 48:1988;235-249.
17. Malone T.C., Conley D.J., Fisher T.R., Glibert P.M., Harding L.W. Scales of nutrient-limited phytoplankton productivity in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries. 19:1996;371-385.
18. Natural Environment Research Council Land-Ocean Interaction Study (LOIS), 1994. Implementation Plan for a Community Research Project. Swindon: NERC Publication, p. 61.
19. Pinder L.C.V., Marker A.F.H., Pinder A.C., Ingram J.K.G., Leach D.V., Collett G.D. Concentrations of suspended chlorophyll a in the Humber rivers. Sci. Total Environ. 194/195:1997;373-378.
20. Skidmore R.E., Maberly S.C., Whitton B.A. Patterns of spatial and temporal variation in phytoplankton chlorophyll a in the River Trent. Sci. Tot Environ. 210/211:1998;357-365.
21. Small, L.F., Morgan, S.R., 1994. Phytoplankton attributes in the turbidity maximum of the Columbia River estuary, USA. In: Dyer, K.R., Orth, R.J. (Eds.), Changes in Fluxes in Estuaries: Implications from Science to Management. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark, pp. 465-472.
22. Vezina A.F., Gratton Y., Vinet P. Mesoscale physical-biological variability during a summer phytoplankton bloom in the lower St Lawrence Estuary. Estuar. Coast Shelf Sci. 41:1995;393-411.
23. Vincent W.F., Bertrand N., Frenette J.J. Photoadaptation to intermittent light across the St. Lawrence Estuary freshwater-saltwater transition zone. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 110:1994;283-292.
24. Wilkinson W.B., Leeks G.J.L., Morris A.W., Walling D.E. Rivers and coastal research in the Land Ocean Interaction Study. Sci. Total Environ. 194/195:1997;5-14.
25. Yentsch C.S., Menzel D.W. A method for the determination of phytoplankton chlorophyll and phaeophytin by fluorescence. Deep Sea Res. 10:1963;221-231.