Simultaneous perturbation optimization for efficient image restoration

IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 356-361

  Maryak, John L ^a   Spall, James C ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; ESTIMATION; OPTIMIZATION; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; RANDOM PROCESSES;

GIBBS SAMPLER; SIMULTANEOUS PERTURBATION STOCHASTIC APPROXIMATION (SPSA);

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION;

EID: 18844460672     PISSN: 00189251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2005.1413767     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Chin, D. C. A more efficient global optimization algorithm based on Styblinski and Tang. Neural Networks, 7 (1994), 573-574.
2. Chin, D. C. Comparative study of stochastic algorithms for system optimization based on gradient approximations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B, 27 (1997), 244-249.
3. Chin, D. C. The simultaneous perturbation method for processing magnetospheric images. Optical Engineering, 38 (1999), 606-611.
4. Chou, K. C., Willsky, A. S., and Benveniste, A. Multiscale recursive estimation, data fusion and regularization. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 39 (1994), 464-478.
5. Geman, S., and Geman, D. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-6 (1984), 721-741.
6. Gerencser, L., Hill, S. D., and Vago, Z. Discrete optimization via SPSA. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Arlington, VA, June 25-27, 2001, 1503-1504.
7. Hurn, M., and Jennison, C. An extension of Geman and Reynolds' approach to constrained restoration and the recovery of discontinuities. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18 (1996), 657-662.
8. Maeda, Y. Hirano, H., and Kanata, Y. A learning role of neural networks via simultaneous perturbation and its hardware implementation. Neural Networks, 8 (1995), 251-259.
9. Maryak, J. L., and Chin, D. C. Global random optimization by simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Arlington. VA, June 25-27, 2001, 756-762.
10. Spall, J. C. A stochastic approximation algorithm for large-dimensional systems in the Kiefer-Wolfowitz setting. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 1988, 1544-1548.
11. Spall, J. C. Multivariate stochastic approximation using a simultaneous perturbation gradient approximation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 37 (1992), 332-341.
12. Spall, J. C. An overview of the simultaneous perturbation method for efficient optimization. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 19 (1998), 482-492, (http://techdigest.jhuapl.edu/td/td1904 /spall.pdf).
13. Spall, J. C. Implementation of the simultaneous perturbation algorithm for stochastic optimization. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 34 (1998), 817-823.
14. Spall, J. C. Adaptive stochastic approximation by the simultaneous perturbation method. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 45 (2000), 1839-1853.
15. Spall, J. C., Hill, S. D., and Stark, D. R. Some theoretical comparisons of stochastic optimization approaches. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Chicago, June 28-30, 2000, 1904-1908.
16. Whitney, J. E., Duncan, K., Richardson, M., and Bankman, I. Parameter estimation in a highly nonlinear model using simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation. Communications is Statistics - Theory and Methods, 29 2000, 1247-1256.
17. Winkler, G. Image Analysis, Random Fields, and Dynamic Monte Carlo Methods. Berlin: Springer, 1995.