Have you met your organization's computer usage policy?

Industrial Management & Data Systems

Volumn 105, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 137-146

  Foltz, Charles B ^a   Paul Cronan, Timothy ^b   Jones, Thomas W ^b  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer crime; Educational policy; Information systems

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CRIME; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; CURRICULA; EDUCATION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; STUDENTS;

BUSINESS COURSES; COMPUTER USAGE POLICY; EDUCATIONAL POLICY; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

PUBLIC POLICY;

EID: 18844456006     PISSN: 02635577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02635570510583280     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Andenaes, J. (1975), “General prevention revisited: research and policy implications”, General Deterrence: A Conference on Current Research and Standpoints, National Swedish Council for Crime Prevention, Stockholm, pp. 12-59.
2. Anderson, L.S. (1979), “The deterrent effect of criminal sanctions: reviewing the evidence”, in Ed. Brentingham, P.J. and Ed. Kress, J.M. (Eds), Structure, Law, and Power, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
3. Anthes, G.H. (1996), “Hack attack: cyberthieves siphon millions from US firms”, Computerworld, Vol. 30 No. 16, p. 81.
4. Backhouse, J. and Dhillon, G. (1995), “Managing computer crime: a research outlook”, Computers & Security, Vol. 14 No. 7, pp. 645-651.
5. Baskerville, R. (1993), “Information systems security design methods: implications for information systems development”, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 375-414.
6. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J. and Nagin, D. (Eds.) (1978), Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
7. Chiricos, T.G. and Waldo, G.P. (1970), “Punishment and crime: an examination of some empirical evidence”, Social Problems, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 200-217.
8. Chou, D.C., Yen, D.C., Lin, B. and Cheng, P.H. (1999), “Cyberspace security management”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 99 No. 8, pp. 353-361.
9. Eid, R. and Trueman, M. (2004), “Factors affecting the success of business-to-business international internet marketing (B-to-B IIM): an empirical study of UK companies”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 104 No. 1, pp. 16-30.
10. Foltz, C.B., Cronan, T.P. and Jones, T.W. (2004), “Information systems misuse and computer crime: an analysis of demographic factors and the awareness of university computer usage policies”, working paper, University of Arkansas, Fort Smith, AR.
11. Gibbs, J.P. (1975), Crime, Punishment, and Deterrence, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam.
12. Harrington, S.J. (1996), “The effect of codes of ethics and personal denial of responsibility on computer abuse judgments and intentions”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 257-278.
13. Haugen, S. and Selin, J.R. (1999), “Identifying and controlling computer crime and employee fraud”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 99 No. 8, pp. 340-344.
14. Henshel, R.L. and Carey, S.H. (1975), “Deviance, deterrence, and knowledge of sanctions”, in Ed. Henshel, R.L. and Ed. Silverman, R.A. (Eds), Perception in Criminology, Columbia University Press, New York, NY, pp. 54-73.
15. Hollinger, R.C. (1988), “Computer hackers follow a Guttman-like progression”, Sociology and Social Research, Vol. 72 No. 3, pp. 199-200.
16. Hollinger, R.C. (1992), “Crime by computer: correlates of software piracy and unauthorized account access”, Security Journal, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 2-12.
17. Kundu, S.C. (2004), “Impact of computer disasters on information management: a study”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 104 No. 2, pp. 136-143.
18. Lang, C. (1995), “Who's spying now?”, Netguide, Vol. 2 No. 7, pp. 44-50.
19. Nagin, D. (1978), “General deterrence: a review of the empirical evidence”, Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, pp. 93-139.
20. Nance, W.D. and Straub, D.W. (1988), “An investigation into the use and usefulness of security software in detecting computer abuse”, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Systems, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 283-294.
21. Paternoster, R. and Simpson, S. (1996), “Sanction threats and appeals to morality: testing a rational choice model of corporate crime”, Law and Society Review, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 549-583.
22. Piscitello, D. and Kent, S. (2003), “The sad and increasingly deplorable state of internet security”, Business Communications Review, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 49-53.
23. Power, R. (2002), “2002 CSI/FBI computer crime and security survey”, Computer Security Issues & Trends, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 1-22.
24. Romney, M. (1995), “Computer fraud – what can be done about it?”, The CPA Journal, Vol. 65 No. 5, pp. 30-33.
25. Salisbury, W.D., Pearson, R.A., Pearson, A.W. and Miller, D.W. (2001), “Perceived security and world wide web purchase intention”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 101 No. 4, pp. 165-176.
26. Schwartz, K.D. (1997), “Hackers are ubiquitous, malicious, and taken far too lightly, experts say”, Government Computer News, Vol. 16 No. 23, pp. 81-82.
27. Skinner, W.F. and Fream, A.M. (1997), “A social learning theory analysis of computer crime among college students”, The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 495-518.
28. So, M.W.C. and Sculli, D. (2002), “The role of trust, quality, value and risk in conducting e-business”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 102 No. 9, pp. 503-512.
29. Solarz, A. (1987), “Computer-related embezzlement”, Computers & Security, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 49-53.
30. Stair, R.M. and Reynolds, G.W. (1998), Principles of Information Systems: A Managerial Approach, 3rd ed., Course Technologies, Cambridge, MA.
31. State of California (1975), “Public knowledge of criminal penalties”, in Ed. Henshel, R.L. and Ed. Silverman, R.A. (Eds), Perception in Criminology, Columbia University Press, New York, NY, pp. 74-90.
32. Straub, D.W. (1986), “Deterring computer abuse: the effectiveness of deterrent countermeasures in the computer security environment”, dissertation, Indiana University Graduate School of Business, South Bend, IN.
33. Straub, D.W. (1987), “Controlling computer abuse: an empirical study of effective security countermeasures”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, December, pp. 277-289.
34. Straub, D.W. (1990), “Effective IS security: an empirical study”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 255-276.
35. Straub, D.W. and Hoffer, J.A. (1988), “Computer abuse and computer security administration: a study of contemporary information security methods”, IRMIS working paper No. W801, Institute for Research on the Management of Information Systems, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
36. Williams, K.R. and Hawkins, R. (1986), “Perceptual research on general deterrence: a critical review”, Law and Society Review, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 545-572.
37. Wong, K. (1985), “Computer crime: risk management and computer security”, Computers & Security, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 287-295.