Constrained H∞ control of active suspensions: An LMI approach

IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 412-421

  Chen, Hong ^a   Guo, Kong Hui ^a  

^a JILIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Active suspensions; H performance; Linear matrix inequality (LMI) optimization; Reachable set; Time domain constraints

Indexed keywords

ACTUATORS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; OPTIMIZATION; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); STATE FEEDBACK; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS; VECTORS; VEHICLE SUSPENSIONS;

ACTIVE SUSPENSIONS; LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITY (LMI) OPTIMIZATION; REACHABLE SET; TIME DOMAIN CONSTRAINT; UNCERTAIN PARAMETERS;

OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 18844438869     PISSN: 10636536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TCST.2004.841661     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. D. Hrovat, "Survey of advanced suspension developments and related optimal control applications," Automatica, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1781-1817, 1997.
2. T. Gordon, C. Marsh, and M. Milsted, "A comparison of adaptive LQG and nonlinear controllers for vehicle suspension systems,Vehicle Syst. Dyn., vol. 20, pp. 321-340, 1991.
3. D. Hrovat, "Applications of optimal control to advanced automotive suspension design," ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, vol. 115, pp. 328-342, 1993.
4. A. Alleyne, P. Neuhaus, and J. Hedrick, "Application of nonlinear control theory to electronically controlled suspensions," Vehicle Syst. Dyn., vol. 22, pp. 309-320, 1993.
5. A. Ulsoy, D. Hrovat, and T. Tseng, "Stability robustness of LQ and LQG active suspensions," ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, vol. 116, pp. 123-131, 1994.
6. A. Hac, "Decentralized control of active vehicle suspensions with preview," ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, vol. 117, pp. 478-483, 1995.
7. A. Alleyne and J. Hedrick, "Nonlinear adaptive control of active suspensions," IEEE Trans. Contr. Syst. Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 94-101, Jan. 1995.
8. D. Williams and W. Haddad, "Active suspension control to improve vehicle ride and handling," Vehicle Syst. Dyn., vol. 28, pp. 1-24, 1997.
9. J.-S. Lin and I. Kannellakopoulos, "Nonlinear design of active suspensions," IEEE Control Syst. Mag., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 45-49, Jun. 1997.
10. F. Yu and D. Crolla, "An optimal self-tuning controller for an active suspension," Vehicle Syst. Dyn., vol. 29, pp. 51-65, 1998.
11. A. Hac, "Adaptive control of vehicle suspension," Vehicle Syst. Dyn., vol. 16, pp. 57-74, 1987.
12. R. S. Sharp and S. A. Hassan, "The relative performance capabilities of passive, active, and semi-active car suspension systems," Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. D, Transp. Eng., vol. 200, no. 3, pp. 219-223, 1986.
13. M. N. Tran and D. Hrovat, "Application of gain-scheduling to design of active suspensions," in Proc. 32nd IEEE Conf. Decision Control, 1993, pp. 1030-1035.
14. ∞ control to active suspension systems," Automatica, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1717-1729, 1994.
15. ∞ controller for active suspensions and its robustness based on a full-car model," in Proc. 14th IFAC World Congr., 1999, pp. 503-508.
16. ∞ control of active suspensions," in Proc. Amer. Control Conf., Arlington, VA, 2001, pp. 3329-3334.
17. ∞ control for an integrated suspension system via parameterized linear matrix inequality characterizations," IEEE Trans. Contr. Syst. Technol., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 175-185, Jan. 2001.
18. M. Smith and F.-C. Wang, "Controller parameterization for disturbance response decoupling: Application to vehicle active suspension control," IEEE Trans. Contr. Syst. Technol., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 393-407, May 2002.
19. ∞ -output feedback control of decoupled automobile active suspension systems," IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 392-396, Feb. 1999.
20. I. Fialho and G. J. Balas, "Road adaptive active suspension design using linear parameter-varying gain-scheduling," IEEE Trans. Contr. Syst. Technol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 43-54, Jan. 2002.
21. H. Chen and K. Guo, "An LMI approach to multiobjective RMS gains control for active suspensions," in Proc. Amer. Control Conf., Arlington, VA, 2001, pp. 2646-2651.
22. S. Boyd, L. E. Ghaoui. E. Feron, and V. Balakishnan, Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 1994.
23. C. Scherer, P. Gahinet, and M. Chilali, "Multi-objective output-feedback control via LMI optimization," IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr., vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 896-911, Jul. 1997.
24. A. Giua, C. Seatzu, and G. Usai, "Active axletree suspension for road vehicles with gain-switching," in Proc. 39th IEEE Conf. Decision Control, Sydney, Australia, 2000.
25. K. Zhou, J. C. Doyle, and K. Glover, Robust and Optimal Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1996.
26. J. K. Hedrick and T. Butsuen, "Invariant properties of automotive suspensions," Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., vol. 204, pp. 21-27, 1990.
27. J. A. Levitt and N. G. Zorka, "The influence of tire damping in quarter car active suspension models," ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, vol. 113, pp. 134-137, 1991.
28. C. W. Scherer, H. Chen, and F. Allgöwer, "Disturbance attenuation with actuator constraints by hybrid state-feedback control," in Proc. 41st IEEE Conf. Decision Control, Dec. 2002, pp. 4134-4139.