Experimentally validated 3-D simulation of shock waves generated by dense explosives in confined complex geometries

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 121, Issue 1-3, 2005, Pages 23-30

  Rigas, Fotis ^a   Sklavounos, Spyros ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

CFD; Detonation; Explosion simulation; Explosives; Overpressure; Shock wave

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EXPLOSIVES; HAZARDS; RISK ASSESSMENT; WAVE PROPAGATION;

ACCIDENTAL BLAST WAVE GENERATION; SPACE CONFIGURATION; SPACE CONFINEMENT; SUPERSONIC SPEED;

SHOCK WAVES;

EXPLOSIVE;

EXPLOSION;

ARTICLE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; GEOMETRY; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; SHOCK WAVE; SIMULATION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EXPLOSIONS; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; HIGH-ENERGY SHOCK WAVES; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MODELS, CHEMICAL; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PRESSURE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 18844438374     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.01.031     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Z. Guoshun Causes and lessons of five explosion accidents J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 13 2000 439 442
2. CCPS Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis 2nd ed. 2000 AIChE New York pp. 159-165
3. CCPS Guidelines for Evaluating Process Plant Buildings for External Explosions and Fires 1996 AIChE New York pp. 40-41
4. TNO Green Book Methods for the Determination of Possible Damage, CPR 16E 1989 TNO Green Book Voorburg pp. 2.11-2.12
5. W.E. Baker, and M.J. Tang Gas, Dust and Hybrid Explosions 1991 Elsevier Amsterdam pp. 1-3
6. H. Phillips Explosions in the Process Industries 2nd ed. 1994 IChemE Warwickshire pp. 24-27
7. C.L. Mader Numerical Modeling of Explosives and Propellants 2nd ed. 1996 CRC Press New York pp. 31-32
8. T.C. Chapman, T.A. Rose, and P.D. Smith Blast wave simulation using AUTODYN2D: a parametric study Int. J. Impact Eng. 16 1995 777 787
9. J.M. Powers, and H. Krier Attenuation of blast waves when detonating explosives inside barriers J. Hazard. Mater. 13 1986 121 133
10. S. Sklavounos, and F. Rigas Validation of turbulence models in heavy gas dispersion over obstacles J. Hazard. Mater. 108 2004 9 20
11. E. Binggeli, F. Binggeli, D. Schlapfer, and K.M. Bucher Airblast predictions in tunnel/entrance configurations due to he-detonations near the tunnel portal Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Military Applications of Blast Simulation Hague, The Netherlands 1993 365 375
12. W.E. Baker, P.A. Cox, P.S. Westine, J.J. Kulesz, and R.A. Strehlow Explosion Hazards and Evaluation 1983 Elsevier Amsterdam pp. 106-111
13. N.R. Popat, C.A. Catlin, B.J. Arntzen, R.P. Lindstedt, B.H. Hjertager, T. Solberg, O. Saeter, and A.C. Van den Berg Investigations to improve and assess the accuracy of computational fluid dynamic based explosion models J. Hazard. Mater. 45 1996 1 25
14. T. Huld, G. Peter, and H. Stadtke Numerical simulation of explosion phenomena in industrial environments J. Hazard. Mater. 46 1996 185 195
15. C.A.J. Fletcher Computational Techniques for Fluid Dynamics 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin pp. 105-111, 400-403
16. T.J. Chung Computational Fluid Dynamics 2002 Cambridge University Press Cambridge pp. 262-269, 680-682, 686-692
17. S.H. Park, and J.H. Kwon Implementation of k-ω turbulence models in an implicit multigrid method AIAA J. 42 2004 1348 1357
18. F.R. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications AIAA J. 32 1994 1598 1605
19. H.K. Versteeg, and W. Malalasekera An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics - The Finite Volume Method 1995 Longman New York pp. 49-53, 114-120, 168-173
20. ANSYS Company CFX-5 Solver Theory Manual CFX Ltd. 2003 ANSYS Company Oxfordshire pp. 57-96, 206