Do drug firms hoodwink medical journals? Or is something wrong with the contribution and integrity of declared authors?

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 307-

  Wagena, Edwin J ^a,b   Knipschild, P ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Pulmonary Rehabilitation Centre Hornerheide   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRUG INDUSTRY; FINANCE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; WRITING;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

AUTHORSHIP; DRUG INDUSTRY; HUMANS; PERIODICALS; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY;

EID: 18844433839     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2004.008433     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals http://www.icmje.org (accessed 12 Jan 2004).
2. Rennie D, Flanagan A, Yank V. The contributions of authors. JAMA 2000;284:89-91.
3. Smith R. Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record. Editors make a move. BMJ 2001;323:588.
4. Barnett A. Revealed: how drug firms "hoodwink" medical journals. The Observer 7 Dec 2003 http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1101680,00.html (accessed 2 Nov 2004).