Classical and quantum complexity of the sturm-liouville eigenvalue problem

Quantum Information Processing

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 87-127

  Papageorgiou, A ^a   Wozniakowski H ^b  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

Eigenvalue problem; Numerical approximation; Quantum algorithms

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; GATES (TRANSISTOR); INTEGRATION; MATRIX ALGEBRA; METHOD OF MOMENTS; POLYNOMIALS; PROBABILITY; PROBLEM SOLVING; THEOREM PROVING;

EIGENVALUE PROBLEM; NUMERICAL APPROXIMATION; QUANTUM ALGORITHMS; QUANTUM GATES;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 18844420784     PISSN: 15700755     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11128-005-4481-x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. I. Babuska, and J. Osborn, Eigenvalue Problems, in Handbook of Numerical Analysis, Vol. II, P. G. Ciarlet, J. L. Lions (eds.) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991) pp. 641-787.
2. R. Beals, H. Buhrman, M. Cleve, R. Mosca and R. de Wolf in Proceedings of the Quantum lower bounds by polynomials, FOCS'98, 1998, pp. 352-361. Also http://arXiv.org/quant-ph/9802049.
3. E. Bernstein, and U. Vazirani SIAM J. Computing 26(5), 1411-1473.
4. A. J. Bessen, Phys. Rev. A 71, 042313 (2005). Also http://arXiv.org/ quant-ph/0412008.
5. G. Brassard, P. Hoyer, M. Mosca, and A. Tapp, Am. Math. Soc., 305 53-74 (2002), Also http://arXiv.org/quant-ph/0005055.
6. W. Cheney and D. Kincaid Numerical Mathematics and Computing (5th edition) Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, Ca.
7. R. Cleve, A. Ekert, C. Macchiavello and M. Mosca, Quantum Algorithms Revisited, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 454, 339-354 (1998).
8. L. Collatz, The Numerical Treatment of Differential Equations (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1960).
9. C. Courant and D. Hilbert, Methods of Mathematical Physics, Vol. I (Wiley Classics Library, Willey-Interscience, New York, 1989).
10. J. W. Demmel, Applied Numerical Linear Algebra (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1997).
11. H. Gary, Math. Comput. 19 (91), 365-379 (1965).
12. L. Graver, Phys. Rev. Lett., 79(2), 325-328 (1997). Also http://arXiv.org/quant-ph/9706033.
13. S. Heinrich, J. Complexity 18(1), 1-50 (2002). Also http://arXiv.org/ quant-ph/0105116.
14. S. Heinrich, J. Complexity 19, 19-42 (2003).
15. S. Heinrich, J. Complexity 20, 5-26 (2004). Also http://arXiv.org/quant- ph/0305030.
16. S. Heinrich, J. Complexity 20, 27-45 (2004). Also http://arXiv.org/quant- ph/0305031.
17. P. Jaksch and A. Papageorgiou, Phys. Rev. Lett., 91 (2003). 257902. Also http://arXiv.org/quant-ph/0308016.
18. H. B. Keller, Numerical methods for two-point boundary-value problems, (Blaisdell Pub. Co., Waltham, MA, 1968).
19. B. Z. Kacewicz, J. Complexity, 20(6), 821-834 (2004).
20. A. Nayak and F. Wu, The quantum query complexity of approximating the median and related statistics, STOC 99, 384-393 (1999). Also http://arXiv.org/quant-ph/9804066.
21. M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000).
22. E. Novak, Deterministic and Stochastic Error Bounds in Numerical Analysis, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1349 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988).
23. E. Novak, J. Complexity 17, 2-16 (2001). Also http://arXiv.org/quant-ph/ 0008124.
24. P. W. Shor, SIAM J. Comput. 26(5), 1484-1509 (1997).
25. G. Strang and G. J. Fix, An Analysis of the Finite Element Method (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1973).
26. E. C. Titchmarsh, Eigenfunction Expansions Associated with Second-Order Differential Equations, Part 2 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1955).
27. J. F. Traub, G. W. Wasilkowski and H. Woźniakowski, Information-Based Complexity (Academic Press, New York, 1988).
28. J. F. Traub and A. G. Werschulz, Complexity and Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998).
29. J. F. Traub and H. Woźniakowski, Quant. Inform. Process., 1(5), 365-388 (2002). Also http://arXiv.org/quant-ph/0109113.
30. J. H. Wilkinson, The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1965).
31. C. Zalka, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 454, 313-322 (1998).
32. D. S. Abrams and S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 5162-5165 (1999).