End-user perceptions of ERP systems: a case study of an international automotive supplier

International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 416-424

  Mirchandani, Dinesh ^a   Motwani, Jaideep ^a  

^a GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Automotive supplier; case study; end users; ERP system

Indexed keywords

EID: 18844403195     PISSN: 14709511     EISSN: 17415012     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJATM.2001.000049     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. McNurlin, B. (2001) ‘Will users of ERP stay satisfied?’, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 42, No. 2, p.13.
2. Nelson, R.R. and Cheney, P.H. (1987) ‘Training end-users: An exploratory study’, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp.503–525.
3. Lin, J.C. and Lu, H. (2000) ‘Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to useweb site’, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp.197–208.
4. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1989) ‘User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models’, Management Science, Vol. 35, pp.982–1003.
5. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (2000) ‘A field study of the adoption of software process innovations by information systems professionals’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 47 No. 3, pp.295–308.
6. Lederer, A., Maupin, D., Sena, M. and Zhuang, Y. (2000) ‘The technology acceptance model and the world wide web’, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp.269–282.
7. Lin, W.T. and Shao, B. (2000) ‘The relationship between user participation and system success: a simultaneous contingency approach’, Information & Management, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp.283–295.
8. Mahmood, M., Burn, J. and Gemoets, L. (2000) ‘Variables affecting information technologyend-user satisfaction: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature’. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp.751–771.
9. Davis, F. D. (1989) ‘Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology’, MIS Quarterly, Vol.13, pp.319–340.
10. Lee, S.M., Yeong, R.K. and Lee, J. (1995) ‘An empirical study of the relationships among end user information systems acceptance, training, and effectiveness’, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp.189–202.
11. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (1996) ‘A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test’, Decision Sciences, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp.451–481.
12. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000) ‘A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies’, Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp.–.
13. Lucas, H.C. and Spitler, V. (2000) ‘Implementation in a world of workstations and networks’, Information & Management, Vol. 38, No.2, pp.118–128.
14. Schein, E. (1961) ‘Management development as a process of influence’, Industrial Management Review, Vol. 2, pp.59–77.
15. Doll, W.J. and Torkzadeh, G. (1988) ‘The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction’, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp.259–274.
16. DeLone, W. and McLean, E. (1992) ‘Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable’, Information Systems Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.60–95.