Might we practice what we'ved preached? thoughts on the special issue papers

American Journal of Community Psychology

Volumn 35, Issue 3-4, 2005, Pages 253-258

  Linney, Jean Ann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Community change; Community science methods; Ecology

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY; COMPETENCE; CONFERENCE PAPER; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH PROGRAM; MEDICAL PRACTICE; METHODOLOGY;

COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; ECOLOGY; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 18844401572     PISSN: 00910562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10464-005-3404-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Barker, C., & Pistrang, N. (2005). Quality criteria under methodological pluralism: Implications for conducting and evaluating research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35(3), 201-212.
2. Bennett, C. C., Anderson, L. S., Cooper, S., Hassol, L., Klein, D. C., & Rosenblum, G. (Eds.) (1966). Community psychology: A report of the Boston conference on the education of psychologists for community mental health. Boston: Boston University Press.
3. Chinman, M., Hannah, G., Wandersman, A., Ebener, P., Hunter, S. B., Imm, P., et al. (2005). Developing a community science research agenda for building community capacity for effective preventive interventions. American Journal of Community Psychologyy, 35(3), 143-157.
4. Davidson, W. S., Redner, R., Amdur, R. L., & Mitchell, C. M. (1990) Alternative treatments for troubled youth: The case of diversion from the justice system. New York: Plenum,
5. Fairweather, G. W., & Fergus, E. O. (1993). Empowering the mentally ill. Austin, TX: Fairweather Publishing.
6. Hess, J. Z. (2005). Scientists in the swamp: Narrowing the language-practice gap in community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35(3), 239-252.
7. Julian, D. A. (2005). Enhancing quality of practice through theory of change based evaluation: Science or practice? American Journal of Community Psychologyy, 35(3), 159-168.
8. Kelly, J. G. (2003). Science and community psychology: Social norms for pluralistic inuiry. American Journal of Community Psychologyy, 31, 213-217.
9. Luke, D. A. (2005). Getting the big picture in community science: Methods that capture context. American Journal of Community Psychologyy, 35(3), 185-200.
10. Luke, D. A, Rappaport, J., & Seidman, E. (1991). Setting phenotypes in a mutual help organization: Expanding behavior setting theory. American Journal of Community Psychologyy, 19, 147-167.
11. Miller, R. L., & Shinn, M. (2005). Learning from communities: Overcoming difficulties in dissemination of prevention and promotion efforts. American Journal of Community Psychologyy, 35(3), 169-183.
12. Mrazek, P. J., & Haggety, R. J. (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
13. Oetting, E. R., Donnermeyer, J. J., Plested, B. A., Edwards, R. W., Kelly, W., & Beauvais, F. (1995). Assessing community readiness for prevention. International Journal of Addictionsy, 30, 659-683.
14. Price, R. H., & Lorion, R. P. (1989). Prevention programming as organization reinvention: From research to implementation. In D. Shaffer, I. Philips & N. B. Enzer (Eds.), Prevention of mental disorders, alcohol and other drug use in children and adolescents (pp. 97-123). Rockville, MD: Office of Substance Abuse Prevention and American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
15. Price, R. H., & Behrens, T. (2003). Working Pasteur's quadrant: Harnessing science and action for community change. American Journal of Community Psychologyy, 31, 219-223.
16. Rappaport, J. (2005). Community psychology is (thank God) more than science. American Journal of Community Psychologyy, 35(3), 231-238.
17. Sandler, I., Ostrom, A., Bitner, M. J., Ayers, T. S., & Wolchik, S. (2005). Developing effective prevention services for the real world: A prevention service development model. American Journal of Community Psychologyy, 35(3), 127-142.
18. Sarason, S. B. (2003). The obligations of the moral-scientifc stance. American Journal of Community Psychologyy, 31, 209-211.
19. Spoth, R. L., & Geenberg, M. T. (2005). Toward a comprehensive strategy for effective practitioner-scientist partnerships and larger-scale community benefits. American Journal of Community Psychologyy, 35(3), 107-126.
20. Wandersman, A. (2003). Community science: Bridging the gap between science and practice with community-centered models. American Journal of Community Psychologyy, 31, 227-242.