A textbook case of the nature of science: Laws and theories in the science of biology

International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 141-155

  McComas, William F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Law; Nature of science; Science teaching; Theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 18844392301     PISSN: 15710068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:IJMA.0000016848.93930.9c     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Allchin, D. (2003). Lawson's shoehorn, or should the philosophy of science be rated "X?" Science and Education, 12(3), 315-329.
2. Biggs, A. (1998). Biology: The dynamics of life. Ohio: Glencoe/McGraw Hill.
3. Biggs, A. (2000). Biology: The dynamics of life. Ohio: Glencoe/McGraw Hill.
4. Brandon, R.N. (1997). Does biology have laws? The experimental evidence. Philosophy of Science, Proceeding 1996, 64(2), 444-457.
5. BSCS (1997). BSCS: A human approach. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
6. BSCS (1998). BSCS: An ecological approach, 8th edn. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
7. BSCS (2001). BSCS: A molecular approach, 8th edn. Illinois: Everyday Learning.
8. Campbell, N., Reece, J. & Mitchell, L. (1999). Biology, 5th edn. California: Benjamin/Cummings/Addison Wesley.
9. Carey, S.S. (1994). A beginner's guide to scientific method. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
10. Carnap, R. (1966). Philosophical foundations of physics. New York: Basic Books.
11. Eves, H. (1983). An introduction to the history of mathematics. San Francisco, CA: Saunders College Publishing.
12. Gibbs A. & Lawson, A.E. (1992). The nature of scientific thinking as reflected by the work of biologists and by biology textbooks. The American Biology Teacher, 54(3), 137-152.
13. Gould, S.J. (1988). The case of the creeping fox terrier clone. Natural History, 96(1), 16-24.
14. Holton, G. & Brush, S.F. (2001). Physics, the human adventure. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
15. Horner, J.K. & Rubba, P.A. (1978). The myth of absolute truth. The Science Teacher, 45(1), 29-30.
16. Horner, J.K. & Rubba, P.A. (1979). The laws are mature theories fable. The Science Teacher, 46(2), 31.
17. Hull, D. (1974). Philosophy of biological science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18. Johnson, G. (1998). Biology: Visualizing life. Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
19. Johnson, G. & Raven, P. (1996), Biology: Principles and explorations. Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
20. Johnson, G. & Raven, P. (2001). Biology: Principles and explorations. Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
21. Lawson, A.E. (2003). Allchin's shoehorn, or why science is hypothetico-deductive. Science and Education, 12(3), 331-337.
22. Lerner, L.S. & Bennetta, W.J. (1986). The treatment of theory in textbooks. The Science Teacher, 55(4), 37-41.
23. Lewis, R.W. (1986). Teaching the theories of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 48(6), 344-347.
24. Lewis, R.W. (1988). Biology: a hypothetico-deductive science. The American Biology Teacher, 50(6), 362-366.
25. Lewis, R.W, (1990). Theories, speculation, and the structure of knowledge. Speculations in Science and Technology, 73(1), 13-17.
26. Losee, J. (1993). A historical introduction to the philosophy of science, 3rd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Mayer, E. (1988). Toward a new philosophy of biology. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
28. McComas, W.F. (1997). Reexamining the nature of science: Lessons of misconceptions and misunderstandings from a science educator. Skeptic, 5(2), 88-95.
29. McComas, W.F. & Olson, J. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W.F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 41-52). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30. Miller, K. & Levine, J. (2000). Biology: The Living science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31. Miller, K.R. & Levine, J. (2000). Biology, 5th edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
32. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
33. National Council of Educational Research and Training (2003). National curriculum framework: India. Retrieved from http://www.ncert.nic.in/content.htm on July 15, 2003.
34. National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
35. Ruse, M. (1970). Are there laws in biology? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 48(20), 234-246.
36. Ruse, M. (1973). The philosophy of biology. London: Hutchinson University Library.
37. Schraer, W.D. & Stoltze, H.J. (1999). Biology: The study of life, 7th edn. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
38. Strauss, E. & Lisowski, M. (1998). Biology: The web of life. California: Scott Foresman/Addison Wesley.
39. Strauss, E. & Lisowski, M. (2000). Biology: The history of life. Illinois: Scott Foresman/Addison Wesley.
40. Towle, A. (1999). Modern biology. Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.