Performance management for teachers: Headteachers' perspectives

School Leadership and Management

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 75-

  Haynes, Gill ^a   Wragg, Ted ^a   Wragg, Caroline ^a   Chamberlin, Rosemary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18844392057     PISSN: 13632434     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1363243032000080041     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Lewis (2000) Parochialism and Performance Pay for Teachers. Phi Delta Kappan, 82:1, pp. 3-4.
2. Murnane, RJ and Cohen, DK (1986) Merit Pay and the Evaluation Problem: Why Most Merit Pay Plans Fail and a Few Survive. Harvard Educational Review, 56:1, pp. 1-17.
3. Odden, A. (2000) New and Better Forms Of Teacher Compensation Are Possible. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 5, pp. 361-366.
4. Johnson, S. (1984) Merit pay for teachers: a poor prescription for reform. Harvard Educational Review, 54, pp. 175-185.
5. Protsik, J. (1996) History of Teacher Pay and Incentive Reforms. Journal of School Leadership, 6:3, pp. 265-289.