Student preferences for representations of functions

International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 1-17

  Keller, Brian A ^a   Hirsch, Christian R ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18844389684     PISSN: 0020739X     EISSN: 14645211     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0020739980290101     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Harel, G., and Dubinsky, E., eds. 1992. The Concept of Function:Aspects of Espistomology and Pedagogy, Washington, DC:Mathematical Association of America. MAA Notes No. 25
2. Kaput, J. J., 1985. Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra, Edited by:Wagner, S., and Kieran, C., Reston, VA:NCTM.
3. Skemp, R., 1987. The Psychology of Learning Mathematics, Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Fey, J., 1989. Educ. Studies Math., 20:237–274.
5. Goldenberg, E. P., 1987. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education Edited by:Bergeron, J., Herscovits, N., and Kieran, C., 1197–203.
6. Demana, F., Waits, B., and Harvey, J., eds. 1991. Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics, Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
7. Demana, F., Waits, B., and Harvey, J., eds. 1992. Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics, Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
8. Tucker, T. W., ed. 1991. Priming the Calculus Pump:Innovations and Resources. Washington, DC. MAA notes No. 17
9. Janvier, C. 1987. Problems of Representation in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, Edited by:Janvier, C., Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Ferrini-Mundy, J., and Graham, K. G., 1991. Am. Math. Monthly, 98:627–635.
11. Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., and Stein, M. K., 1990. Rev. Educ. Res., 60:1–64.
12. Tall, D. O., Blokland, P., and Kok, D., 1990. A Graphic Approach to the Calculus, Pleasantville, NY:Sunburst. (I.B.M. compatible software)
13. Heath, R., 1964. Educ. Psychol. Measurement, 26:239–253.
14. Fennema, E., and Behr, M. J., 1980. Research in Mathematics Education, Edited by:Shumway, R. J., Reston, VA:NCTM.
15. Janvier, C., 1990. Teaching and Learning Mathematics in the 1990s 1990 Yearbook, Edited by:Cooney, T., and Hirsch, C., Reston, VA:NCTM.
16. Monk, G., Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA.
17. LaLomia, M. J., Coovert, M. D., and Salas, E., 1988. Problem solving performance and display preference for information displays depicting numerical functions ERIC document:ED308862
18. Dreyfus, T., and Eisenberg, T., 1982. J. Res. Math. Educ., 13:360–380.
19. Hart, D., 1991. Building Concept Images—Supercalculators and Students’ Use of Multiple Representations in Calculus, Oregon State University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
20. Vinner, S., 1988. Theory of Mathematics Education, Proceedings of the Third International Conference, Antwerp, Belgium:University of Antwerp.
21. Battista, M. T., 1990. J. Res. Math. Educ, 21:47–60.
22. Turner, K. V., and Wheatley, G. H., 1980. Mathematics learning styles of calculus students, Anderson College. Unpublished paper
23. Berkey, D., 1988. Calculus, second edition, New York:Saunders College Publishing.
24. Beckmann, C, and Sundstrom, T., 1992. Exploring Calculus with a Graphing Calculator, Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
25. Pence, D., 1992. Calculus Activities for the TI-81 Graphics Calculator, Boston, MA:PWS-KENT.
26. Fey, J., and Heid, K., 1991. Computer-Intensive Algebra, The University of Maryland and The Pennsylvania State University.
27. D'Agostina, R. B., and Stephens, M. A., 1986. Goodness-of-fit Techniques, New York:Marcel Dekker.
28. Mendenhall, W., Sheaffer, R., and Wackerly, D., 1986. Mathematical Statistics with Applications, third edition, Boston, MA:Duxbury Press.
29. Berry, K. J., and Mielke, P. W., Jr. 1988. Educ. Psychol. Measurement, 48:921–933.
30. Keller, B. A., 1997. “ Test reliability of polychotomous preference data ”. In Educational and Psychological Measurement submitted
31. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 1989. Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, Reston, VA:NCTM.
32. Eisenberg, T., 1991. Advanced Mathematical Thinking, Edited by:Tall, D., 14–152. Norwell, MA:Kluwer Academic.