The meaning of the particle lah in Singapore English

Pragmatics and Cognition

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 3-38

  Besemeres, Mary ^a   Wierzbicka, Anna ^b  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cultural semantics; Discourse markers; Natural semantics metalanguage; Particles and cultural values; Pragmatics and conceptual structures; Singapore english; Universal human concepts

Indexed keywords

EID: 18844388714     PISSN: 09290907     EISSN: 15699943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/pc.11.1.03bes     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Ameka, F. 1992. “Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech”. Journal of Pragmatics 18 (Special issue on interjections edited by Felix Ameka): 101-118.
2. Baskaran, L. 1988. Aspects of Malaysian English Syntax. PhD Thesis, University College, London.
3. Bell, R.T. and Ser, L.P.Q. 1983. “‘Today la?’ ‘Tomorrow la!’: the LA particle in Singapore English”. RELC Journal 14(2): 1-18.
4. Bellah, R.N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W.M., Swidler, A., and Tipton, S.M. (eds) 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5. Besemeres, M. 1995. “Rewriting one’s self into English: Milosz translated by Milosz”. The Polish Review 40(4): 415-432.
6. Besemeres, M. 1998. “Language and self in cross-cultural autobiography: Eva Hoffman’s ‘Lost in Translation’”. Canadian Slavonic Papers 40(3-4): 327-344.
7. Besemeres, M. 2000. “Self-translation in Vladimir Nabokov’s ‘Pnin’”. The Russian Review 59(3): 390-407.
8. Besemeres, M. 2002. Translating One’s Self: Language and Selfhood in Cross-Cultural Narratives. Oxford: Peter Lang.
9. Brown, R.W. and Gilman, A. 1960. “The pronouns of power and solidarity”. In T. Sebeok (ed), Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 253-276.
10. Chan, R. Middles. 1991. “The Singaporean and Malaysian speech communities”. In S. Alladain and V. Edwards (eds), Multilingualism in the British Isles (Africa, The Middle East and Asia). New York: Longman Linguistics Library, 207-220.
11. Chu Lik Ren. 1991. “The year of the dragon”. In T. Kandiah (ed), NUS-Shell Short Plays Series: Prize Winning Plays, Vol V. Singapore: UniPress, 97-126.
12. Clyne, M. 1991. Pluricentric Languages: Differing Norms in Different Nations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
13. Cook, H.M. 1990. “The Role of the Japanese Sentence Final Particle ne in the Socialization of children”. Multilingua 9(4): 377-395.
14. Cook, H.M. Encarta World English Dictionary (Microsoft). 1999. London: Bloomsbury.
15. Erman, B. 1987. Pragmatic Expressions in English: A study of you know, you see and I mean in Face-to-face Conversation. (Stockholm Studies in English 69). Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
16. Foley, W. 1997. Anthropological Lingusitics. Oxford: Blackwell.
17. Goddard, C. 1994. “The meaning of lah: Understanding ‘emphasis’ in Malay (Bahasa Melayu)”. Oceanic Linguistics 33(1): 145-165.
18. Goddard, C. 1998. Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Goddard, C. and Wierzbicka, A. (eds). 1994. Semantic and Lexical Universals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20. Goddard, C. and Wierzbicka, A. (eds). 2002. Meaning and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2 volumes.
21. Gupta, A. F. 1992. “The pragmatic particles of Singapore Colloquial English”. Journal of Pragmatics 18: 31-57.
22. Hall, E. C. 1976. Beyond Culture. New York: Anchor Books.
23. Hall, E. T. 1983. The Dance of Life. New York: Doubleday.
24. Heller, M. 1995. “Code-switching and the politics of language”. In: L. Milroy and P. Muysken (eds), One speaker, Two Languages: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on CodeSwitching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 158-174.
25. Heller, M. (ed). 1988. Codeswitching: Anthropological and SociolinguisticPerspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
26. Ho Chee Lick. 2001. “The cultural grounding of Singapore English”. In: V. Ooi (ed), 102-111.
27. Itani, R. 1998. “A relevance-based analysis of hearsay particles: With special reference to Japanese sentence-final particle tte". In R. Carston and S. Uchida (eds), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 47-68.
28. Jorgensen, J.N. 1998. “Children’s code-switching for power-wielding”. In: P. Auer (ed), Code-Switching in Conversation: Language, Interaction and Identity. London and New York: Routledge, 237-261.
29. Jucker, A. H. and Smith, S.W. 1998. “And people just you know like ‘wow’: Discourse markers as negotiating strategies”. In A.H. Jucker and Y. Ziv (eds) Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 177-201.
30. Kamio, A. 1994. “The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese”. Journal of Pragmatics 21: 67-100.
31. Kamio, A. 1995. “Territory of information in English and Japanese psychological utterances”. Journal of Pragmatics 24: 235-264.
32. Kwan Terry, A. 1978. “The meaning and the source of the ‘la’ and the ‘what’ particles in Singapore English”. RELC Journal 9(2): 22-35.
33. Kwan Terry, A. 1992. “Towards a dictionary of Singapore English. Issues relating to making entries forparticles in Singapore English”. In A. Pakir (ed), Words in a Cultural Context. Singapore: UniPress, 62-72.
34. Lee Gek Ling. 1994. “Is Singlish becoming a language of prestige?” In D. da Cunha (ed), Debating Singapore: Reflective Essays. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 81-82.
35. Leibniz, G.W. 1903. Opuscules et fragments inédits de Leibniz. Edited by Louis Couturat. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
36. Leibniz, G.W. 1949. New Essays Concerning Human Understanding. La Salle, IL: The Open Court Publishing Company.
37. Leo, D. 2000[1995]. Kiasu-Kiasi — You Think What?Singapore: Times Books International.
38. Lim Wee Teck. 1990. “A daughter’s story”. In R. Yeo (ed), NUS-Shell Short Plays Series: Prize Winning Plays, vol IV. Singapore: UniPress.
39. Locke, J. 1959[1691]. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by A.C. Fraser. New York: Dover.
40. Loke Kit-Ken and Johna Low Mei-Yin. 1988. “A proposed descriptive framework for the pragmatic meanings ofthe particle la in colloquial Singaporean English”. In B. McCarthy (ed), Asian-Pacific Papers. Regional papers presented at the 8th World Congress of Applied Linguistics, University of Sydney, 16-21, August, 1987. Wollongong: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia, 150-161.
41. Luke, K. K. 1990. Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
42. Marmaridou, S.A. 2000. Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
43. Maynard, S.K. 1989. Japanese Conversation: Self-contextualization through Structure and Interactional Management. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
44. Maynard, S. K. 1997. Japanese Communication: Language and Thought in Context. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
45. Mel’cuk, I. and Iordanskaja, L. 1999. “Textual connectors across languages: French EN EFFET vs. Russian V SAMOM DELE”. RASK9/10 [= E Pluribus Una, edited by J. Mey], 305-347.
46. Nikolaeva, T.M. 1985. Funkcii castic v vyskazyvanii. Moscow: Nauka.
47. Ooi, V.B. Y. 2001. “Globalising Singaporean-Malaysian English in an inclusive learner’s dictionary”. In B. Moore (ed), Who’s Centric Now: The Present State of Post- and Colonial Englishes. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 95-121.
48. Ooi, V.B.Y. (ed). 2001. Evolving Identities: The English language in Singapore and Malaysia. Singapore: Times Academic Press.
49. Östman, J-O. 1981. You know: A Discourse-Functional Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
50. Pakir, A. 1992. “Dictionary entries for discourse particles”. In A. Pakir (ed), Words in a Cultural Context. Singapore: Unipress, 143-152.
51. Pakir, A. 2001. “The voices of English-knowing bilinguals and the emergence of new epicentres”. In: Ooi (ed), 1-11.
52. Platt, J. 1987. “Communicative functions of particles in Singapore English”. In R. Steele and T. Threadgold (eds), Language Topics. Essays in honour of Michael Halliday. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 391-401.
53. Platt, J. and Ho Mian Lian. 1989. “Discourse particles in Singapore English: Substratum influences and universals”. World Englishes 8(2): 215-221.
54. Rathmayr, R. 1985. Die russischen Partikeln als Pragmalexeme. München: Verlag Otto Sagner.
55. Richards, J.C. and Tay, M.W.J. 1977. “The la particle in Singapore English”. In W. Crewe (ed), The English Language in Singapore. Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Hong Kong: Eastern Universities Press, 141-156.
56. Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Schourup, L.C. 1985. Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. New York: Garland.
58. Stubbe, M. and Holmes, J. 1995. “You know, eh and other ‘exasperating expressions’: An analysis of social and stylistic variation in the use of pragmatic devices in a sample of New Zealand English”. Language and Communication 15(1): 63-88.
59. Tannen, D. 1984. Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
60. Tannen, D. 1993. “The relativity of linguistic strageties in gender and dominance: Rethinking power and solidarity”. In D. Tannen (ed), Gender and Conversational Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press, 165-188.
61. Tannen, D. Times-Chambers Essential English Dictionary. 1997.2nd edition. Singapore: Federal Publications/Chambers-Harrap.
62. Travis, C. 2001. A Semantic Analysis of Discourse Markers in Colombian Spanish. PhD Dissertation, Melbourne, LaTrobe University.
63. Uyeno, T.Y. 1971. A Study of Japanese Modality — A Performative Analysis of Sentence Particles. PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan.
64. Wee, L. 1998. “The Lexicon of Singapore English”. In J.A. Foley, T. Kandiah, Bao Zhiming, A.F. Gupta, L. Alsagoff, Ho Chee Lick, L. Wee, I.S. Talib, and W. Bokhorst-Heng (eds), English in New Cultural Contexts: Reflections from Singapore. Singapore: Oxford University Press, 179-200.
65. Weydt, H. 1977. Aspekte der Modalpartikeln: Studien zur dt. Abtonung. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
66. Weydt, H. 1983. Partikeln und Interaktion. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
67. Wierzbicka, A. 1976. “Particles and Linguistic Relativity”. International Review of Slavic Linguistics 1: 2-3, 327-367.
68. Wierzbicka, A. 1986. “Introduction”. Journal of Pragmatics. Special Issue on ‘Particles’. 10(5): 519-534.
69. Wierzbicka, A. 1987. English Speech Act Verbs: A semantic dictionary. Sydney: Academic Press.
70. Wierzbicka, A. 1991. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
71. Wierzbicka, A. 1994. “‘Cultural scripts’: A new approach to the study of cross-cultural communication”. In M. Pütz (ed), Language Contact and Language Conflict. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 69-87.
72. Wierzbicka, A. 1996a. Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73. Wierzbicka, A. 1996b. “Japanese cultural scripts: Cultural psychology and ‘cultural grammar’”. Ethos 24(3): 527-555.
74. Wierzbicka, A. 1997. Understanding Cultures through their Key Words: English, Russian, Polish, German, Japanese. New York: Oxford University Press.
75. Wierzbicka, A. 2002. “Australian cultural scripts: “bloody” revisited”. Journal of Pragmatics 34(9):1167-1209.
76. Wierzbicka, A. In press. “Singapore English: A semantic and cultural perspective”. Multilingua.
77. Wittgestein, L. 1961[1921] Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Tr. by D.F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
78. Wittgenstein, L. 1953 Philosophical Investigations. Tr. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
79. Wong J.O.1994. A Wierzbickan Approch to Singlish Particles. MA Thesis, National University of Singapore.
80. Wong J.O. 2000. “The ‘mE’ particle of Singlish”. Centre for Advanced Studies Research Papers Series 18. Singapore: Centre for Advanced Studies.
81. Wong J.O. 2001. “To speak or not to speak? The ‘a’ particles of Singlish”. Centre for Advanced Studies Research Papers Series 20. Singapore: Centre for Advanced Studies.