Effect of training-pruning regimes on Eutypa dieback and performance of 'Cabernet Sauvignon' grapevines

Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 313-318

  Gu, Sanliang ^a   Cochran, Robert C ^a   Du, Guoqiang ^a   Hakim, Abdul ^a   Fugelsang, Kenneth C ^a   Ledbetter, John ^b   Ingles, Chuck A ^c   Verdegaal, Paul S ^c  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Vino Farms Inc   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EUTYPA; EUTYPA DIEBACK;

EID: 18844368020     PISSN: 14620316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2005.11511936     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. CATER, M. V. (1988). Eutypa Dieback. In: Compendium of Grape Diseases. (Pearson, R. C. and Goheen, A. C., Eds.). The American Phytopathological Society Press, MN, USA. 32-4.
2. CHAPUIS, L., RICHARD, L. and DUBOS, B. (1998). Variation in susceptibility of grapevine pruning wound to infection by Eutypa lata in south-western France. Plant Pathology, 47, 463-72.
3. DUTHIE, J. A., MUNKVOLD, G. P., MAROIS, J. J., GRANT, R. S. and CHELLEMI, D. O. (1991). Relationship between vineyard age and incidence of Eutypa dieback. (Abstract). Phytopathology, 81, 1183.
4. GUBLER, W. D. and LEAVITT, G. M. (1992). Eutypa dieback of grapevine. In: Grape Pest Management. 2nd Edition. (Flaherty, D. L., Jensen, F. L., Kasimatis, A. N., Kido, H. and Moller, W.J., Eds.). University of California, Oakland, CA, USA. 71-5.
5. LAKE, C. B., STRIEGLER, R. K., VERDEGAAL, P. S., BERG, G. T. and WOLPERT, J. A. (1996). Influence of training system on growth, yield, fruit composition and Eutypa incidence of 'Cabernet Sauvignon' grapevines. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Cool Climate Viticulture and Enology. Rochester, New York, USA. III-19-26.
6. LAKE, C. B., STRIEGLER, R. K., VERDEGAAL, P S., BERG, G. T., WOLPERT, J. A. and INGELS, C. A. (1998). Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines. How training system and soil type influence yield and quality. American Vineyard, (July), 27-31.
7. MCCARTHY, M. G. and CIRAMI, R. M. (1990). Minimal pruning effects on the performance of selections of four Vitis vinifera cultivais. Vitis, 29, 85-96.
8. MOLLER, W. J. and KASIMATIS, A. N. (1978). Dieback of grapevines caused by Eutypa armeniacae. Plant Disease Reporter, 62, 254-8.
9. MOLLER, W. J. and KASIMATIS, A. N. (1980). Protection of grapevine pruning wounds from Eutypa dieback. Plant Disease, 64, 278-80.
10. MOLLER, W. J. and KASIMATIS, A. N. (1981). Eutypa dieback of grapevines. In: Grape Pest Management. (Flaherty, D. L., Jensen, F. L., Kasimatis, A. N., Kido, H. and Moller, W. J., Eds.). University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. 57-61.
11. MOLLER, W. J., KASIMATIS, A. J. and KISSLER, J. J. (1974). A dying arm disease of grape in California. Plant Disease Reporter, 58, 869-71.
12. MORRIS, J. R. and CAWTHON, D. L. (1981). Yield and quality response of Concord grapes to mechanized vine pruning. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 32, 280-2.
13. MUNKVOLD, G. P. and MAROIS, J. J. (1995). Factors associated with variation in susceptibility of grapevine pruning wounds to infection by Eutypa lata. Phytopathology, 85, 249-56.
14. MUNKVOLD, G. P., DUTHIE, J. A. and MAROIS, J. J. (1994). Reductions in yield and vegetative growth of grapevines due to Eutypa dieback. Phytopathology, 84, 186-92.
15. OHLENDORF, B., FLINT, M. L. and BUSH, M. (1996). UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines: Grape. Publication 3339. DANR Publications, University of California, Oakland, CA, USA.
16. PETZOLDT, C. H., MOLLER, W. J. and SALL, M. A. (1981). Eutypa dieback of grapevines: seasonal differences in infection and duration of susceptibility of pruning wounds. Phytopathology, 71, 540-3.
17. PETZOLDT, C. H., SALL, M. A. and MOLLER, W. (1983a). Eutypa dieback of grapevines: ascospore dispersal in California. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 34, 265-70.
18. PETZOLDT, C. H., SALL, M. A. and MOLLER, W. (1983b). Factors determining the relative number of ascospores releases by Eutypa armeniacae in California. Plant Disease, 67, 857-60.
19. RAMOS, D. E., MOLLER, W. J. and ENGLISH, H. (1975). Production and dispersal of ascospores of Eutypa armeniacae in California. Phytopathology, 65, 1364-71.
20. REYNOLDS, A. G. (1988). Response of Okanagan Riesling vines to training system and simulated mechanical pruning. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 39, 205-11.
21. ROBY, G. and MATTHEWS, M. A. (2004). Relative proportions of seeds, skin and flesh, in ripe berries from Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines grown in a vineyard either well irrigated or under water deficit. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 10, 74-82.
22. ROBY, G., HARBERTSON, J. F., ADAMS, D. A. and MATTHEWS, M. A. (2004). Berry size and vine water deficits as factors in wine-grape composition: anthocyanins and tannins. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 10, 100-7.
23. STUDER, H. and KLIEWER, M. (1988). Mechanical vine pruning in California. Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Mechanical Pruning of Vineyards. Villanova di Motta di Livenza (Treviso), Association Italiana di Genio Rurale (AIGR), Italy. 24-30.
24. TRESE, A. T., BURTON, C. L. and RAMSDELL, D. C. (1980). Eutypa armeniacae in Michigan vineyards: ascospore production and survival, host infection, and fungal growth at low temperature. Phytopathology, 70, 788-93.