Ellipsis and discourse-linking

Lingua

Volumn 110, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 183-213

  López, Luis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

D Linking; Ellipsis; Functional categories; Licensing; NP Ellipsis; Sluicing

Indexed keywords

EID: 18744433702     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0024-3841(99)00036-4     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Abney, S., 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
2. Aoun, J. and Y.A. Li, 1993. Syntax of scope. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
3. Asher, N., 1993. Reference to abstract objects in discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4. Bernstein, J., 1993. The syntactic role of word markers in null nominal constructions. Probus 5, 5-38.
5. Brucart, J.-M., 1986. La elisión sintáctica en Español. Barcelona: Promocions Publicacions UAB.
6. Carstens, V., 1991. The syntax of DP in Kiswahili. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
7. Chao, W., 1988. On ellipsis. New York: Garland.
8. Chomsky, N., 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. '
9. Chomsky, N., 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory, In: K. Hale and J. Keyser, (eds.), The view from building 20, 1-53. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Chomsky, N., 1995. Categories and transformations. In: The minimalist program.: 219-394. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Chomsky N. and H. Lasnik, 1993. Principles and parameteres theory. In: J. JacobsA. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld and T. Vennemann (eds.). Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research. Berlin, De Gruyter.
12. Chung, S., W. Ladusaw and J. McCloskey, 1995. Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics 3, 239-282.
13. Contreras, H., 1989. On Spanish empty N' and N*. In: Carl Kirschner and J. DeCesaris (eds.). Studies in Romance linguistics, 83-96. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
14. Drubig, H., 1994. Island constraints and the syntactic nature of focus and association with focus. Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs, University of Tübingen, Germany.
15. Enç, M., 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 1-25.
16. Fintel, K. von, 1993. Exceptive constructions. Natural Language Semantics 1, 123-148.
17. Fintel, K. von, 1994. Restriction on quantifier domains. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachussets, Amherst, MA. Distributed by GSLA.
18. Ginzburg, J., 1992. Questions, queries and facts: A semantics and pragmatics for interrogatives. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
19. Haïk, I., 1987. Bound VPs that need to be. Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 503-530.
20. Hankamer, J., 1978. On the transformational derivation of some null VP anaphors. Linguistic Inquiry 9, 66-74.
21. Hardt, D., 1993. Verb phrase ellipsis: Form meaning and processing. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
22. Harris, J., 1991. The exponence of gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 27-62.
23. Heim, I., 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachussets, Amherst, MA.
24. Hornstein, N., 1995. Logical form. New York: Blackwell.
25. Howard, H., 1993. ΣP, affected inversion and topicalization in English and Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
26. Huang, C.-T.J., 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 531-574.
27. Jackendoff, R., 1971. Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2(1): 21-30.
28. Jackendoff, R., 1977. X' syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Jayaseelan, K.A., 1990. Incomplete VP-deletion and gapping. Linguistic Analysis 20, 64-81.
30. Johnson, K., 1997. What VP-ellipsis can do, and what it can't, but not why. Manuscript, University of Massachussets, Amherst, MA.
31. Kayne, 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. King, N., 1970. On blocking the rules for contraction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 1, 134-136.
33. Klein, E., 1987. VP ellipsis. In: DR theory. In: Groenendijk, de Jongh and Stokhof (eds.), Studies in DRT and the theory of generalized quantifiers, 161-187. Dordrecht: Foris.
34. Laka, I., 1990. Negation in syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
35. Lappin, S., 1996. The interpretation of ellipsis. In: S. Lappin (ed.), Handbook of contemporary semantic theory, 145-175. New York: Blackwell.
36. Lasnik, H., 1995. A note on pseudogapping. In: R. Pensalfini and H. Ura (eds.), Papers on minimalist syntax. MIT working papers in linguistics 27, 143-164. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
37. Levin, N., 1979. Main verb ellipsis in spoken English. Ohio State University working papers in linguistics 24, 65-165. Department of Linguistics, OSU, Columbus, OH.
38. Liberman, M. and A. Prince, 1977. On stress and linguistic rythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 249-336.
39. Lobeck, A., 1987. Syntactic constraints on VP ellipsis. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN.
40. Lobeck, A., 1993. Strong agreement and identification: Evidence from ellipsis in English. Linguistics 31, 777-811.
41. Lobeck, A., 1995. Ellipsis. New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Longobardi, G., 1994. Reference and proper names. Linguistic Inquiry, 25: 609-666.
43. López, L., 1995. Polarity and predicate anaphora. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
44. López, L., 1997. VP-ellipsis in English and Spanish and the features of auxiliaries. Manuscript, University of Missouri. To appear in Probus.
45. López, L. and S. Winkler, 1998. Information structure in VP-Anaphora. Manuscript, University of Missouri-Columbia and Universität Tübingen. To appear in Linguistics.
46. Napoli, D.J., 1985. Verb phrase deletion: A base generated analysis. Linguistics 21, 281-319.
47. Nerbonne, J., M. Iida and W. Ladusaw, 1989. Running on empty: Null heads in head-driven grammar. In: E.J. Fee and K. Hunt (eds.), Proceedings of West Coast Conference of Formal Linguistics 8, 276-288. Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
48. Nerbonne, J., M. Iida and W. Ladusaw, 1990. Semantics of common noun phrase anaphora. In: Proceedings of West Coast Conference of Formal Linguistics 9, 379-394. Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
49. Pesetsky, D., 1987. Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In: E. Reuland and G.B. ter Meulen (eds.). The Representation of (In)definiteness: 98-129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Pollock, J.Y., 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365-433.
51. Prince, E., 1992. The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information-status. In: S Thompson and W. Mann (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse analysis of a fundraising text: 295-325. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
52. Prüst, H., R. Scha and M. van den Berg, 1993. Discourse grammar and verb phrase grammar. Linguistics and Philosophy 17, 261-327.
53. Ramos-Santacruz, M., 1996. On the nature of discourse ellipsis: Evidence from sluicing. Paper presented at the LSA annual meeting.
54. Reinhart, T., 1991. Elliptic conjunctions-non-quantificational LF. In: A. Kasher (ed.), The Chomskian Turn: 360-384. New York: Blackwell.
55. Rigau, G., 1988. Strong pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 19, 503-511.
56. Rizzi, L., 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Roca, F., 1996. La determinación y la modificación nominal en Español. Ph.D. dissertation, UAB, Barcelona, Spain.
58. Rooth, M., 1992. Ellipsis redundancy and reduction redundancy. In: S. Berman and A. Hestvik (eds.), Proceedings of the Stuttgart Ellipsis Workshop. 1-19. Universität Stuttgart, Germany.
59. Ross, J.R., 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
60. Ross, J.R., 1969. Guess who. In: R. Binnick (ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 252-286. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
61. Sag, I., 1976. Deletion and logical form. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
62. Selkirk, E., 1994. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. In: J. Goldsmith (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 550-569. New York: Blackwell.
63. Sleeman, P., 1996. Licensing empty nouns in French. Amsterdam: Holland Insitute of Generative Linguistics.
64. Stroik, T., 1999. Superiority effects and adjunct referentiality in English multiple-wh constructions. Manuscript, University of Missouri, MO.
65. Stump, G., 1981. The semantic variability of absolute constructions. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
66. Tancredi, C., 1992. Deletion, deaccenting and presupposition. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
67. Ward, G. and B. Birner, 1995. Definiteness and the English existential. Language 71, 722-742.
68. Wasow, T., 1972. Anaphoric relations in English. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
69. Williams, E., 1977. Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 101-139.
70. Williams, E., 1997. Blocking and anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 28, 577-628.
71. Zagona, K., 1982. Government and proper government of verbal projections. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
72. Zagona, K., 1988. Proper government of antecedentless VP in English and Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 95-128.
73. Zanuttini, R., 1991. Syntactic properties of sentential negation: A comparative study of the romance languages. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
74. Zwicky, A. and G. Pullum, 1983. Cliticization vs. inflection: English 'n't'. Language 59, 503-513.