Male advertisement call characters as phylogeographical indicators in European water frogs

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 355-365

  Wycherley, Julia ^a   Doran, Simon ^b   Beebee, Trevor J C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Call characters; Intraspecific variation; Rana esculenta; Rana lessonae; Rana ridibunda

Indexed keywords

CALLING BEHAVIOR; FROG; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; VOCALIZATION;

EUROPE; FROG; GENETIC DRIFT; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; VOCALIZATION;

ANURA; RANA ESCULENTA; RANA LESSONAE; RANA RIDIBUNDA;

EID: 18744401604     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2002.00104.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abt G, Reyer H-U. 1993. Mate choice and fitness in a hybrid frog: Rana esculenta females prefer Rana lessonae males over their own. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 32: 221-228.
2. Boas ML. 1983. Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Bradbury JW, Vehreneamp SL. 1998. Principles of Animal Communication. Sunderland MA: Sinauer Associates.
4. Brzoska J. 1982. Vocal response of male European water frogs (Rana esculenta complex) to mating and territorial calls. Behavioural Processes 7: 37-47.
5. Dubois A. 1998. Lists of European species of amphibians and reptiles: Will we soon be reaching 'stability'? Amphibia-Reptilia 19: 1-28.
6. Feng AS, Narins PM, Capranica RR. 1975. Three populations of primary auditory fibers in the bullfrog Rana catesbeiana): Their peripheral origins and frequency sensitivities. Journal of Comparative Physiology 100: 221-229.
7. Gasc J-P. 1997. Atlas of Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe. Paris: Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle.
8. Gerhardt HC. 1994. The evolution of vocalisation in frogs and toads. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25: 293-324.
9. Gerhardt HC, Tanner SD, Corrigan CM, Walton HC. 2000. Female preference functions based on call duration in the grey tree frog (Hyla versicolor). Behavioural Ecology 11: 663-669.
10. Graf J-D, Polls-Pelaz M. 1989. Evolutionary genetics of the Rana esculenta Complex. In: Dawley RM, Bogart JP, eds. Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates. New York State Museum, Albany, New York, Bulletin 466: 289-301.
11. Haftorn S, Hailman JP. 1997. Do the Siberian tits Parus cinctus in Scandinavia and Siberia speak the same language? Bioacoustics 8: 223-247.
12. Hasegawa Y, Ueda H, Sumida M. 1999. Clinal geographic variation in the advertisement call of the Wrinkled frog, Rana rugosa. Herpetologica 55 (3): 318-324.
13. Hewitt GM. 2000. The genetic legacy of the quaternary ice ages. Nature 405: 907-913.
14. Ibrahim KM, Nichols RA, Hewitt GM. 1996. Spatial patterns of genetic variation generated by different forms of dispersal during range expansion. Heredity 77: 282-291.
15. Kasuya E, Shiobara S. 1996. Variation in the advertisement call in the foam-nesting Treefrog Rhacophorus arboreus. Bioacoustics 7: 1-11.
16. Kaya U, Simmons AM. 1999. Advertisement calls of the Tree frogs, Hyla arborea and Hyla savigni (Anura: Hylidae) in Turkey. Bioacoustics 10: 175-190.
17. Kuhn B, Schneider H. 1984. Mating and terrestrial calls of the frog Rana ridibunda and their temperature-dependent variability. Zoologischer Anzeiger Jena 212 (5/6): 237-305.
18. Littlejohn MJ. 1977. Long range communication in Anurans: An integrated and evolutionary approach. In: Taylor DH, Guttman SI, eds. The Reproductive Biology of Amphibians. New York: Plenum Press, 263-294.
19. Lode T. 2001. Character convergence in advertisement call and mate choice in two genetically distinct water frog lineages (Rana kl. esculenta, Rana kl. graft). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 39 (1-2): 91-96.
20. Mudry KM, Constantine-Paton M, Capranica RR. 1977. Auditory sensitivity of the diencephalon of the leopard frog, Rana pipiens. Journal of Comparative Physiology 114: 1-14.
21. Mulgrew B, Grant P, Thompson J. 1999. Digital Signal Processing - Concepts and Applications. London: Macmillan.
22. Negovetic S, Anholt BR, Semlitsch RD, Reyer H-U. 2001. Specific responses of sexual and hybridogenetic European water frog tadpoles to temperatures. Ecology 82: 766-774.
23. Pagano A, Joly P. 1999. Limits of the morphometric method for field identification of water frogs. Alytes 16 (3-4): 130-138.
24. Plenet S, Hervant F, Joly P. 2000. Ecology of the hybridogenetic Rana esculenta complex: Differential oxygen requirements of tadpoles. Evolutionary Ecology 14: 13-23.
25. Radwan NMM, Schneider H. 1988. Social behaviour, call repertory and variation in the calls of the pool frog, Rana lessonae (Anura: Ranidae). Amphibia-Reptilia 9: 329-351.
26. Rafinski J, Babik W. 2000. Genetic differentiation among northern and southern populations of the moor frog Rana arvalis Nilsson in central Europe. Heredity 84: 610-618.
27. Roesli M, Reyer H-U. 2000. Male vocalisation and female choice in the hybridogenetic Rana lessonae/Rana esculenta complex. Animal Behaviour 60: 745-755.
28. Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W. 1991. Evolution of intraspecific variation in the advertisement call of a cricket frog (Acris crepitans, Hylidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 44: 249-271.
29. Sanchez-Herraiz MJ, Marquez R, Barbadillo LJ, Bosch J. 1995. Mating calls of three species of anurans from Borneo. Herpetological Journal 5: 293-297.
30. Schneider H, Haxhiu I. 1994. Mating-call analysis and taxonomy of the Water Frogs in Albania (Anura: Ranidae). Zoologische Jahrbucher Systematik 121: 248-262.
31. Schneider H, Sofianidou TS, Kyriakopoulou-Sklavounou P. 1984. Bioacoustic and morphometric studies in water frogs (genus Rana) of Lake Ioannina in Greece, and description of a new species (Anura, Amphibia). Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 22 (4): 349-366.
32. Semlitsch RD. 1993. Effects of different predators on the survival and development of tadpoles from the hybridogenetic water frog complex. Oikos 67: 40-46.
33. Singleton RC. 1967. A method for computing the Fast Fourier Transform with auxiliary memory and limited high-speed storage. Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics AU-15 2: 91-98.
34. Sinsch U, Eblenkamp B. 1994. Allozyme variation among Rana balcanica, R. levantina and R. ridibunda (Amphibia: Anura): Genetic differentiation corroborates the bioacoustically detected species status. Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 32: 35-43.
35. Sinsch U, Schneider H. 1996. Bioacoustic assessment of the taxonomic status of pool frog populations (Rana lessonae) with reference to a topotypical population. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 34: 63-73.
36. Sjogren P. 1991. Genetic variation in relation to demography of peripheral pool frog populations (Rana lessonae). Evolution Ecology 5: 248-271.
37. Som C, Anholt BR, Reyer H-U. 2000. The effect of assortative mating on the coexistence of a hybridogenetic waterfrog and its sexual host. American Naturalist 156: 34-46.
38. Taberlet P, Fumagalli L, Wust-Saucy A-G, Cossons J-F. 1998. Comparative phylogeography and postglacial colonisation routes in Europe. Molecular Ecology 7: 453-464.
39. Terhune JM, Healey SR, Burton HR. 2001. Easily measured call attributes can detect vocal differences between Weddell seals from two areas. Bioacoustics 11: 211-222.
40. Ulriksson B. 1986. Conversion of frequency-domain data to the time domain. Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineering 74 (1): 74-77.
41. Vincent P. 1990. The Biogeography of the British Isles. London: Routledge.
42. Wright TF, Wilkinson GS. 2001. Population genetic structure and vocal dialects in an amazon parrot. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268: 609-616.
43. Wycherley J, Beebee TJC, Doran S. 2001. Regional accents in the Pool frog? Development of new computer analytical techniques aids bioacoustic separation of Pool frog populations and may elucidate the status of Norfolk Pool frogs. Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin, Zoologische Reiche 77 (1): 25-30.
44. Wycherley J, Doran S, Beebee TJC. 2002. Frog calls echo microsatellite phylogeography in the European pool frog Rana lessonae. Journal of Zoology (London). in press.
45. Zeisset I, Beebee TJC. 2001. Determination of biogeographical range: An application of molecular phylogeography to the European Pool frog Rana lessonae. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268: 933-938.
46. Zeisset. I, Beebee TJC. 1998. RAPD identification of north European water frogs. Amphibia-Reptilia 19: 163-170.
47. Zuk M, Rotenberry JT, Simmons LW. 2001. Geographic variation in calling song of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: The importance of spatial scale. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14: 731-741.