A model based reasoning approach for generating plausible crime scenarios from evidence

Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 51-59

  Keppens, Jeroen ^a   Zeleznikow, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

abductive reasoning; crime investigation; decision support systems; model based reasoning

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTIVE REASONING; CRIME INVESTIGATION; DECISION SUPPORTS; INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS; MODEL BASED REASONING; NATURAL DEATH; ROBUST DECISIONS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION THEORY;

CRIME;

EID: 18744400086     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1047788.1047796     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Badiru, A. B., Karasz, J. M., and Holloway, R. T. Arest: Armed robbery eidetic suspect typing expert system. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 16(3):210-216, 1988.
2. Brown, D. E. The regional crime analysis program (RECAP): A framework for mining data to catch criminals. In Proceedings for the 1998 International Conference on Systems, MAN, and Cybernetics, pages 2848-2853, 1998.
3. Chen, H., Schroeder, J, Hauck, R. V., Ridgeway, L., Atabakhsh, H., Gupta, H., Boarman, C., Rasmussen, K., and Clements, A. W. COPLINK Connect: Information and knowledge management for law enforcement. Decision Support Systems: Special Issue on Digital Government, 34(3):271-285, 2002.
4. de Kleer, J. An assumption-based TMS. Artificial Intelligence, 28:127-162, 1986.
5. de Kleer, J. A general labeling algorithm for assumption-based truth maintenance. In Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 188-192, 1988.
6. Dzemydiene, D. and Rudzkiene, V. Multiple: regression analysis in crime pattern warehouse for decision support. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pages 249-258, 2000.
7. Esmaili, M., Safavi-Naini, R., Balachandran, B., and Pieprzyk, J. Case-based reasoning for intrusion detection. In IEEE Twelfth Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, pages 214-223, 1996.
8. Falkenhainer, B. and Forbus, K. Compositional modeling: finding the right model for the job. Artificial Intelligence, 51:95-143, 1991.
9. Hamscher, W., Console, L., and de Kleer, J., editors. Readings in Model-Based Diagnosis, Morgan-Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1992.
10. Hand, D., Mannila, H., and Smyth, P. Principles of Data Mining. MIT Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 2001.
11. Hauck, R. V., Atabakhsh, H., Ongvasith, P., Gupta, H., and Chen, H. Using coplink to analyze criminal justice data. IEEE Computer, 35(3):30-37, 2002.
12. Jung, C., Han, I., and Suh, B. Risk analysis for electronic commerce using case-based reasoning. International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance & Management, 8:61-73, 1999.
13. Keppens, J. Compositional Ecological Modelling via Dynamic Constraint Satisfaction with Order-of-Magnitude Preferences. PhD thesis, The University of Edinburgh, 2002.
14. Keppens, J. and Shen, Q. On compositional modelling. Knowledge Engineering Review, 16(2):157-200, 2001.
15. Keppens, J. and Zeleznikow, J. On the role of model-based reasoning in decision support in crime investigation. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Law and Technology, pages 77-83, 2002.
16. Prakken, H. Modelling reasoning about evidence in legal procedure. In Proceedings of the 8th Internation Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 119-128, 2001.
17. Prakken, H., Reed, C., and Walton, D. Argumentation schemes and generalisations in reasoning about evidence. In Proceedings of the 9th Internation Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2003.
18. Prakken, H. and Sartor, G. A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 4:331-368, 1996.
19. Ratledge, E. C. and Jacoby, J. E. Handbook on Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems in Law Enforcement. Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut, 1989.
20. Ribaux, O. and Margot, P. Inference structures for crime analysis and intelligence: the example of burglary using forensic science data. Forensic Science International, 100:193-210, 1999.
21. Schum, D. The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning. Northwestern University Press, 1994.
22. Valcour, L. Investigate B& E: Break & enter expert system. Technical Report TR-11-97, Canadian Police Research Centre, 1997.
23. Walton, D. Argumentation and theory of evidence. New Trends in Criminal Investigation and Evidence, 2:711-732, 2000.