Review of Jaap Hage's law and defeasibility

Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn 11, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 245-250

  Bulygin, Eugenio ^a  

^a NONE   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; FORMAL LOGIC; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

JAAP HAGE'S LAW; LEGAL REASONING; LOGICAL THEORY; NON-MONOTONIC LOGIC;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 18744390358     PISSN: 09248463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:ARTI.0000046012.44321.27     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Alchourron, C. E. (1991). Philosophical Foundations of Deontic Logic and the Logic of Defeasible Conditionals. In Ch. Meyer, J.-J. and R.J. Wieringa (eds.), Deontic Logic in Computer Science, Amsterdam.
2. Alchourrón, C. E. (1993). Philosophical Foundations of Deontic Logic and the Logic of Defeasible Conditionals. In Ch. Meyer, J.-J. and Wieringa, R. J. (eds.), Deontic Logic in Computer Science, 43-84, John Wiley: Chicester.
3. Alchourrón, C. E. (1995). Defeasible Logics: Demarcation and Affinities. In Crocco, G. Fariñas del Cerro, L. and Herzig, A. (eds.), Conditionals: From Philosophy to Computer Science, Oxford University Press: Oxford.
4. Alchourrón, C. E. (1996). Detachment and Defeasibility in Deontic Logic, Studia Logica 57, 5-18.
5. Bayon, J. C. (2001). Why is legal reasoning defeasible?. In Soeteman, A. (ed.) Pluralism and law, 327-346, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.
6. Bayon, J. C. and J. Rodriguez (2003). Relevancia normativa en la justification de las decisiones judiciales, Universidad Externado de Colombia: Bogota.
7. Rodriguez, J. and G. Sucar (1998). Las trampas de la derrotabilidad. Niveles de analisis de la indeterminacion del derecho", Analisi e Diritto, 277-305.