Law and defeasibility

Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn 11, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 221-243

  Hage, Jaap ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Defeasibility; Legal justification; Non monotonic logic

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FORMAL LOGIC; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

DEFEASIBILITY; LEGAL JUSTIFICATION; LEGAL REASONING; NON-MONOTONIC LOGIC;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 18744389524     PISSN: 09248463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:ARTI.0000046011.13621.08     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alchourrón, C. E. (1993). Philosophical Foundations of Deontic Logic and the Logic of Defeasible Conditionals. In Meyer, J. and Wieringa, R. (eds), Deontic Logic in Computer Science, 43-84. Wiley: Chichester.
2. Alchourrón, C. E. and Bulygin, E. (1971). Normative Systems, Springer: Wien.
3. Alexy, R. (1978). Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.
4. Alexy, R. (1996). Theorie der Grundrechten, 3e Auflage. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.
5. Bayón, J. C. (2001). Why is Legal Reasoning Defeasible? In Soeteman, A. (ed.), Pluralism in Law, 327-346. Kluwer Acadamic Publishers: Dordrecht.
6. Hage, J. C. (1997). Reasoning with Rules. Kluwer Acadamic Publishers: Dordrecht.
7. Hage, J. C. (2001). Legal Logic, Its Existence, Nature and Use. In Soeteman, A. (ed.), Pluralism in Law, 347-374. Kluwer Acadamic Publishers: Dordrecht.
8. Hage, J. C. (2004). Law and Coherence. Ratio Juris 16: 87-105.
9. Hart, H. L. A. (1949). The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 49: 171-194.
10. Israel, D. J. (1980). What's Wrong with Non-monotonic Logic? In Proceedings of the First Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 99-101.
11. MacCormick, D. N. (1995). Defeasibility in Law and Logic, In Bankowski, Z. et al., Informatics and the Foundations of Legal Reasoning, 99-118. Kluwer Acadamic Publishers: Dordrecht.
12. Pollock, J. L. (1995). Cognitive Carpentry. A Blueprint for how to Build a Person. MIT Press: New York.
13. Prakken, H. (1997). Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument, A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law. Kluwer Acadamic Publishers: Dordrecht.
14. Prakken, H. and Sartor, G. (1996). A Dialectical Model of Assessing Conflicting Arguments in Legal Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4: 331-368.
15. Prakken, H. and Sartor, G. (eds.) (1997). Logical Models of Legal Argumentation. Kluwer Acadamic Publishers: Dordrecht.
16. Prakken, H. and Sartor, G. (2004). The Three Faces of Defeasibility in the Law. Ratio Juris 17: 118-139.
17. Raz, J. (1975). Practical Reason and Norms. Hutchinson: London.
18. Sartor, G. (1995). Defeasibility in Legal Reasoning. In Bankowski, Z. et al., Informatics and the Foundations of Legal Reasoning, 119-158. Kluwer Acadamic Publishers: Dordrecht.
19. Schauer, F. (1991). Playing by the Rules. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
20. Soeteman, A. (1989). Logic in Law. Kluwer Acadamic Publishers: Dordrecht.
21. Soeteman, A. (2003). Do We Need A Legal Logic? In Folgelklou, A. and Spaak, T. (eds), Festskrift till Ake Frändberg, 221-234. Iustus Förlag: Uppsala.
22. Toulmin, S. E. (1953). The Philosophy of Science. An Introduction. Hutchinson: London.
23. Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
24. Verheij, H. B. (1996). Rules, Reasons, Arguments. Formal Studies of Argumentation and Defeat. Ph.D thesis. Maastricht University.