The role of 3-D geomagnetic induction in the determination of the ionospheric currents from the ground geomagnetic data

Annales Geophysicae

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 909-917

  Pulkkinen, Antti ^a   Engels, M ^b  

^a NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER   (United States)

^b FEDERAL INSTITUTE FOR GEOSCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES BGR   (Germany)

Author keywords

Geomagnetism and paleomagnetism (Geomagnetic induction)

Indexed keywords

GEOMAGNETIC FIELD; IONOSPHERE;

EID: 18744389447     PISSN: 09927689     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-23-909-2005     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Amm, O. and Viljanen, A.: Ionospheric disturbance magnetic field continuation from the ground to ionosphere using spherical elementary current systems, Earth, Planets and Space, 51, 431-440, 1999.
2. Avdeev, D. B., Kuvshinov, A. V., Pankratov, O. V., and Newman, O. G.: Three-dimensional induction logging problems, Part I: An integral eqution solution and model comparisons, Geophysics, 67(2), 413-426, 2002.
3. Beamish D., Clark, T. D. G., Clarke, E., and Thomson, A. W. P.: Geomagnetically induced currents in the UK: geomagnetic variations and surface electric fields. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys, 64, 1779-1792, 2002.
4. Berdichevsky, M. and Zhdanov, M,: Advanced theory of deep geomagnetic sounding, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Netherlands, 408, 1984.
5. Boteler, D. H. and Pirjola, R. J.: The complex-image method for calculating the magnetic and electric fields produced at the surface of the Earth by the auroral electrojet, Geophys. J. Int., 132(1), 31-40, 1998.
6. Engels, M., Korja, T., and BEAR Working Group: Multisheet modelling of the electrical conductivity structure in the Fennoscandian Shield, Earth Planets Space, 54, 559-573, 2002.
7. Heinson, G.: Electromagnetic studies of the lithosphere and asthenosphere, Surv. Geophys., 20, 229-255, 1999.
8. st and on magnetic variations at mid-latitude stations, J. Geophys. Res., 107, doi:10.1029/ 2001JA900130, 2002.
9. Jackson, D.: Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1999.
10. Kaikkonen, P.: Thin-sheet modeling for deep electromagnetic studies in the Fennoscandian shield, Deep Electromagnetic Exploration, edited by: Roy, K. K., Sherma, S. K., and Mallick, K., Narossa Publishing House, 364-386, 1998.
11. Kamide, Y. and Baumjohann, W.: Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling, Physics and Chemistry in Space, 23, 178, 1993.
12. Kauristie, K., Pulkkinen, T. I., Pellinen, R. J., and Opgenoorth, H. J.: What can we tell about global auroral electrojet activity from a single meridional magnetometer chain?, Ann. Geophys., 14, 1177-1185, 1996, http://direct.sref.org/1432-0576/ag/1996-14-1177 SRef-ID: 1432-0576/ ag/1996-14-1177.
13. Korja, T., Engels, M., Zhamaletdinov, A. A., Kovtun, A. A., Palshin, N. A., Smirnov, M. Yu., Tokarev, A., Asming, V. E., Vanyan, L. L., Vardaniants I. L., and the BEAR Working Group: Crustal conductivity in Fennoscandia - a compilation of a database on crustal conductance in the Fennoscandian Shield, Earth, Planets and Space, 54, 535-558, 2002.
14. Mareschal, M.: Modelling of natural sources of magnetospheric origin in the interpretation of regional induction studies: a review, Surveys in Geophysics, 8, 261-300, 1986.
15. Maurer, H. and Theile, B.: Parameters of the Auroral Electrojet From Magnetic Variations Along a Meridian. J. Geophys., 44, 415-426, 1978.
16. Olsen, N. and Kuvshinov, A.: Modeling the ocean effect of geomagnetic storms, Earth Planets Space, 56, 525-530, 2004.
17. Pirjola, R.: Electromagnetic induction in the Earth by a plane wave or by fields of line currents harmonic in time and space, Geophysica, 18, 1982.
18. Pulkkinen, A., Amm, O., Viljanen, A., and BEAR Working Group: Ionospheric equivalent current distributions determined with the method of spherical elementary current systems, J. Geophys. Res., 108, doi:10.1029/2001JA005085, 2003a.
19. Pulkkinen, A., Amm, O., Viljanen, A., and BEAR Working Group: Separation of the geomagnetic variation field on the ground into external and internal parts using the spherical elementary current system method, Earth, Planets and Space, 55, 117-129, 2003b.
20. Schmucker, U.: Anomalies of geomagnetic variations in the southwestern United States, 13., Bull. Scripps, Institution of Oceanographie, University of California, 1970.
21. Tanskanen, E. I., Viljanen, A., Pulkkinen, T. I., Pirjola, R., Häkkinen, L., Pulkkinen, A., and Amm, O.: At substorm onset, 40% of AL comes from underground, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 13 119-13 134, 2001.
22. Tanskanen, E.: Terrestrial substorms as a part of global energy flow, PhD thesis, Finnish Meteorological Institute, Contributions, 36, 2002.
23. Thomson, D. J. and Weaver, J. T.: The complex image approximation for induction in a multilayered Earth, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 123-129, 1975.
24. Untiedt, J. and Baumjohann, W.: Studies of polar current systems using the IMS Scandinavian magnetometer array, Space Sci. Rev., 63, 245-390, 1993.
25. Varentsov, I., Engels, M., Korja, T., Smirnov, M., and the BEAR Working Group: A generalized model of Fennoscandia: a challenging database for long-period 3-D modeling studies within the Baltic Electromagnetic Array Research (BEAR) project, Izvestija, Phys. Solid Earth, 38, 855-896, 2002.
26. Viljanen, A., Kauristie, K., and Pajunpää, K.: On induction effects at EISCAT and IMAGE magnetometer stations, Geophys. J. Int., 121, 893-906, 1995.
27. Viljanen, A., Amm, O., and Pidola, R.: Modeling geomagnetically induced currents during different ionospheric situations, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 28 059-28 072, 1999.