Summarization evaluation using relative utility

International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 508-511

  Radev, Dragomir R ^a   Tam, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Relative Utility; Text Summarization

Indexed keywords

DATA COMPRESSION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MEASUREMENTS; PROBLEM SOLVING; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS; VECTORS;

CONTENT-BASED METRICS; MANUAL EXTRACTS; RELATIVE UTILITY; TEST SUMMARIZATION;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 18744387235     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/956863.956960     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (4)

1. Hongyan Jing, Kathleen McKeown, Regina Barzilay, and Michael Elhadad. Summarization Evaluation Methods: Experiments and Analysis. In Intelligent Text Summarization. Papers from the 1998 AAAI Spring Symposium. Technical Report SS-98-06, pages 60-68, Standford (CA), USA, March 23-25 1998. The AAAI Press.
2. Jade Goldstein, Mark Kantrowitz, Vibhu O. Mittal, and Jaime G. Carbonell. Summarizing text documents: Sentence selection and evaluation metrics. In Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 121-128, Berkeley, California, 1999.
3. Dragomir R. Radev, Hongyan Jing, and Malgorzata Budzikowska. Centroid-based summarization of multiple documents: sentence extraction, utility-based evaluation, and user studies. In ANLP/NAACL Workshop on Summarization, Seattle, WA, April 2000.
4. Robert L. Donaway, Kevin W. Drummey, and Laura A. Mather. A Comparison of Rankings Produced by Summarization Evaluation Measures. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Automatic Summarization, ANLP-NAACL2000, pages 69-78. Association for Computational Linguistics, 30 April 2000.