Variations in figurative language use as a function of mode of communication

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 31-49

  Boerger, Michael A ^a  

^a Division of Social Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication mode; Figurative language; On line education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LANGUAGE; SEMANTICS;

COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; INTERNET; LANGUAGE; SEMANTICS;

EID: 18744373687     PISSN: 00906905     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10936-005-3630-9     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Barlow J.M., Kerlin J.R. Pollio H.R. (1971). Training manual for identifying figurative language (Technical Report #1). Knoxville: Metaphor research group, University of Tennessee
2. M.A. Boerger T.B. Henley 1999 The use of analogy in giving instructions The Psychological Record. 49 193 209
3. A. Chapanis R.B. Ochsman R.N. Parrish G.D. Weeks 1972 Studies in interactive communication: I. The effects of four communication modes on the behavior of teams during cooperative problem-solving. Human Factors. 14 487 509
4. A. Chapanis R.N. Parrish R.B. Ochsman G.D. Weeks 1977 Studies in interactive communication: II The effects of four communication modes on the linguistic performance of teams during cooperative problem-solving. Human Factors. 19 101 126
5. H.H. Clark S. E. Brennan 1991 Grounding in communication. L.B. Resnick J. M. Levine S. D. Teasley Perspectives on socially shared cognition American Psychological Association Washington, D. C 127 149
6. H.H. Clark D. Wilkes-Gibbs 1986 Referring as a collaborative process Cognition 22 1 39
7. P.R. Cohen 1984 The pragmatics of referring and the modality of communication Computational Linguistics 10 97 146
8. M.A. Columbus P.J. Boerger 2002 Defining popular iconic metaphor Psychological Reports 90 579 582
9. S.R. Fussell R.M. Krauss 1989 The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 25 203 219
10. S. Glucksberg 1989 Metaphors in conversation: How are they understood? Why are they used? Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 4 125 143
11. M.G. Johnson R.G. Malgady 1979 Some cognitive aspects of figurative language: association and metaphor Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 8 3 249 265
12. S. Kiesler J. Siegel T.W. McGuire 1984 Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication American Psychologist. 39 10 1123 1134
13. R.M. Krauss S.R. Fussell 1991 Constructing shared communicative environments. L. L. Resnick J. Levine S. Teasley Perspectives on socially shared cognition American Psychological Association Washington, D. C 172 202
14. R.M. Krauss S. Glucksberg 1977 Social and nonsocial speech Scientific American. 236 100 105
15. R.M. Krauss S. Weinheimer 1964 Changes in the length of reference phrases as a function of social interaction; A preliminary study Psychonomic Science. 1 113 114
16. G. Lakoff M. Johnson 1980 Metaphors we live by University of Chicago Press Chicago
17. R.B. Ochsman A. Chapanis 1974 The effects of 10 communication modes on the behavior of teams during cooperative problem-solving International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 6 579 619
18. A. Ortony 1975 Why metaphors are necessary and not just nice Educational Theory 25 45 53
19. H.R. Pollio J.M. Barlow H.J. Fine M.R. Pollio 1977 Psychology and the poetics of growth: Figurative language in psychology, psychotherapy and education Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc Hillsdale, N. J
20. H.R. Pollio M.K Smith. M.R. Pollio 1990 Figurative language and cognitive psychology Language and Cognitive Processes. 5 141 167
21. F.C. Stoll D.G. Hoecker G.P. Krueger A. Chapanis 1976 The effects of four communication modes on the structure of language used during cooperative problem solving The Journal of Psychology. 94 13 26
22. R.R. Verbrugge 1985 Language and event perception: Steps toward a synthesis. W. H. Warren R. Shaw Persistence and Change Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, N. J 157 194