Post-marketing surveillance: A UK/European perspective

Current Medical Research and Opinion

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 565-570

  Gough, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Drug safety; Europe; Pharmacovigilance; Post marketing studies; UK

Indexed keywords

2,4 THIAZOLIDINEDIONE DERIVATIVE; INSULIN DETEMIR; NEW DRUG; PIOGLITAZONE; ROSIGLITAZONE; TROGLITAZONE;

CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DRUG LEGISLATION; DRUG SAFETY; DRUG SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; EUROPE; HUMAN; LICENSING; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTMARKETING SURVEILLANCE; PRESCRIPTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SIDE EFFECT; UNITED KINGDOM;

EUROPE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; PRODUCT SURVEILLANCE, POSTMARKETING; PUBLIC POLICY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 18744371089     PISSN: 03007995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1185/030079905X41426     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry. http//www.abpi.org.uk/statistics/intro.asp [last accessed 4 March 2005]
2. DiMassi JA, Hansen RW, Grabowski HG. The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. J Health Econ 2003;22:151-85
3. New prescribing advice for the 40mg dose of Crestor (rosuvastatin) http://medicines.mhra.gov.uk/ [last accessed 4 March 2005]
4. Merck. Merckannounces voluntary worldwide withdrawal of VIOXX®. http://www.vioxx.com/vioxx/documents/english/vioxx_press_release.pdf [last accessed 4 March 2005]
5. Martin K, Bégaud B, Latry P, Miremont-Salamé G, Fourier A, Moore N. Differences between clinical trials and post-marketing use. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003;57:86-92
6. Schmucker DL, Vesell ES. Underrepresentation of women in clinical drug trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993;42(Suppl):11-5
7. Bugeja G, Kumar A, Banerjee AK. Exclusion of elderly people from clinical research: a descriptive study of published reports. Br Med J 1997;315:1059
8. The yellow card scheme: how the yellow card scheme protects patients. https://www.mhra.gov.uk/medicines/safety/yellowcard/howprotects.htm [last accessed 4 March 2005]
9. Monitoring the safety and quality of medicines; new drugs under intense surveillance. http://medicines.mhra.gov.uk/ourwork/monitorsafequalmed/newdrugs/ newdrugs.htm [last accessed 4 March 2005]
10. Heeley E, Riley J, Layton D, Wilton LV, Shakir SAW. Prescription-event monitoring and reporting of adverse drug reactions. Lancet 2001;358:1872-73
11. Smith CC, Bennett PM, Pearce HM, et al. Adverse reactions in a hospital general medical unit meriting notification to the Committee on Safety of Medicines. Br J Pharmacol 1996;42:423-9
12. Mittmann N, Knowles SR, Gomez M, Fish JS, Cartotto R, Shear NH. Evaluation of the extent of under-reporting of serious adverse drug reactions: the case of toxic epidermal necrolysis. Drug Safety 2004;27:477-87
13. Begaud B, Martin K, Haramburu F, Moore N. Rates of reporting of adverse drug reactions in France. J Am Med Assoc 2002;288:1588
14. Backstrom M, Mjorndal T, Dahlqvist R. Under-reporting of serious adverse drug reactions in Sweden. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2004;13:483-7
15. Guidelines for company-sponsored Safety Assessment of Marketed Medicines (SAMM) guidelines. Medicines Control Agency, Committee on Safety of Medicines, Royal College of General Practitioners, British Medical Association and association of British Pharmaceutical Industry (November 1993). Br J Pharmacol 1994;2:95-7
16. Pharmacovigilance medicinal products for human and veterinary use, vol. 9: Section 1.5. Company-sponsored post-authorisation studies. http://www.eudravigilance.org/human/docs/Vol9en.pdf [last accessed 4 March 2005]
17. ICH harmonised tripartite guideline. Pharmacovigilance planning E2E. http//www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/6002dft.pdf [last accessed 4 March 2005]
18. Mehran R, Leon MB, Feigal DA, et al. Post-market approval surveillance: a call for a more integrated and comprehensive approach. Circulation 2004;109:3073-7
19. BMA fees guidance schedule, Section 6, April 2003 http://www/bma.org.uk [last accessed 4 March 2005]
20. Guidance on the use of glitazones for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/TA63_Glitazones_Review_Guidance.pdf [last accessed 4 March 2005]
21. Department of Health. Research for Patient Benefit Working Party. Final report 2004. http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/08/26/75/04082675.pdf [last accessed 4 March 2005]
22. Work programme for the European Medicines Agency 2005. http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/general/direct/emeawp/13835104en.pdf [last accessed 4 March 2005.