Improvement of large-seeded common bean cultivars under sustainable cropping systems in Spain

Euphytica

Volumn 142, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 85-95

  Santalla, M ^a   Lema, M ^a   Rodino A P ^a   Gonzalez A M ^a   Monteagudo, A B ^a   De Ron, A M ^a  

^a MISIÓN BIOLÓGICA DE GALICIA CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

Intercropping; Phaseolus vulgaris; Quality; Seed weight; Yield

Indexed keywords

PHASEOLUS (ANGIOSPERM); PHASEOLUS VULGARIS; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 18744369689     PISSN: 00142336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-005-0816-z     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Beaver, J.S., 1993. A simple method for producing seed from hybrid dwards derived from crossed between Middle American and Andean gene pools. Annu Rept Bean Improv Coop 36: 28-29.
2. Beaver, J.S., 1999. Improvement of large-seeded race Nueva Granada cultivars. In: S.P. Singh (Ed.), Common bean improvement in the twenty-first century, pp. 275-288. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
3. Beaver, J.S. & J.D. Kelly, 1994. Comparison of selection methods for dry bean populations derived from crosses between gene pools. Crop Sci 25: 923-926.
4. Debouck, D.G., O. Toro, O.M. Paredes, W.C. Johnson & P. Gepts, 1993. Genetic diversity and ecological distribution of Phaseolus vulgaris in northwestern South Africa. Econ Bot 47: 408-423.
5. FAO, 1999. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Statistics series No. 156. Production Vol. 53. Rome, Italy. 2001.
6. Francis, C.A., M. Prager, D.R. Laing & C.A. Flor, 1978. Genotype x environment interactions in bush bean cultivars in monoculture and associated with maize. Crop Sci 18: 237-241.
7. Gepts, P. & F.A. Bliss, 1985. F1 hybrid weakness in the common bean: Differential geographic origin suggest two gene pools in cultivated bean germplasm. J Hered 76: 447-450.
8. Koinange, E.M.K. & P. Gepts, 1992. Hybrid weakness in wild Phaseolus vulgaris L. J Hered 83: 135-159.
9. Kornegay, J., J.W. White & O. Ortíz de la Cruz, 1992. Growth habit and gene pool effects on inheritance of yield in common bean. Euphytica 62: 171-180.
10. Nienhuis, J. & S.P. Singh, 1986. Combining ability analysis and relationships among yield, yield components and architectural traits in dry beans. Crop Sci 26: 21-27.
11. Santalla, M., A.M. De Ron & M.R. Escribano, 1994. Effect of intercropping bush bean populations with maize on agronomic traits and their implications for selection. Field Crops Res 36: 185-189.
12. Santalla, M., A.M. De Ron & P.A. Casquero, 1995. Nutritional and culinary quality of bush bean populations intercropped with maize. Euphytica 84: 57-65.
13. Santalla, M., A.M. De Ron & O. Voysest. 2001. European bean market classes. In: M. Amurrio, M. Santalla & A.M. De Ron (Eds.), Catalogue of bean genetic resources, pp. 77-94, FAIR5-PL97-3463 programme.
14. Santalla, M., A.P. Rodiño & A.M. De Ron, 2002. Allozyme evidence supporting southwestern Europe as a secondary center of genetic diversity for common bean. Theor Appl Genet 104: 934-944.
15. SAS Institute, 2000. The SAS System. SAS online Doc. HTLM Format. Version eight. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
16. Schoonhoven van, A. & M.A. Pastor-Corrales (comps), 1987. Standard system for the evaluation of bean germplasm. CIAT, Cali, Colombia.
17. Singh, S.P., 1992. Common bean improvement in the tropics. Plant Breed Rev 10: 199-269.
18. Singh, S.P., 1994. Gamete selection for simultaneous improvement of multiple traits in common bean. Crop Sci 34: 352-355.
19. Singh, S.P., 1995. Selection for seed yield in Middle American versus Andean x Middle American interracial common bean populations. Plant Breed 114: 269-271.
20. Singh, S.P., 2001. Broadening the genetic base of common bean cultivars: A review. Crop Sci 41: 1659-1675.
21. Singh, S.P., C. Cajiao, J.A. Gutiérrez, J. García, 1989. Selection for seed yield in inter-gene pool crosses of common bean. Crop Sci 29: 1126-1131.
22. Singh, S.P., P. Gepts & D.G. Debouck, 1991. Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ Bot 45: 379-396.
23. Singh, S.P., H. Terán, C. Germán Muñoz & J.C. Takegami, 1999. Two cycles of recurrent selection for seed yield in common bean. Crop Sci 39: 391-397.
24. Singh, S.P., H. Terán, C.G. Muñoz & J.M. Osorno, 2002. Selection for seed yield in Andean intra-gene pool and Andean x Middle American inter-gene pool of common bean. Euphytica 127: 437-444.
25. Skroch, P.W. & J. Nienhuis, 1995. Qualitative and quantitative characterization of RAPD variation among snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes. Theor Appl Genet 91: 1078-1085.
26. Thung, M. & I.M. Rao, 1999. Integrated management of abiotic stresses. In: S.P. Singh (Ed.), Common bean improvement in the twenty-first century, pp. 331-370. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
27. Urrea, C.A. & S.P. Singh, 1995. Comparison of recurrent and congruity backcrossing for interracial hybridization in common bean. Euphytica 81: 21-26.
28. Welsh, W., W. Bushuk, W. Roca & S.P. Singh, 1995. Characterization of agronomic traits and markers of recombinant inbred lines from intra- and interracial populations of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Theor Appl Genet 91: 169-177.
29. Willet, W.C., F. Sacks, A. Trichopoulou, G. Drescher, A. Ferro-Luzzi, E. Helsing & D. Trichoupoulos, 1995. Mediterranean diet pyramid: A cultural model for healthy eating. Am J Clin Nutr 61: 1402-1406.