Comments on the unruptured aneurysm study from Japan; does this study clarify what to do?

Journal of Neurosurgery

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 593-596

  Ausman, James I ^a   Morita, Akio ^b   Kirino, Takaaki ^b   Fujiwara, Satoru ^c   Hashi, Kazuo ^d  

^a UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c Konan Hospital   (Japan)

^d Pacific Neurosurgical Consulting   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN ARTERY ANEURYSM; BRAIN ARTERY ANEURYSM RUPTURE; CLINICAL FEATURE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; EDITORIAL; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL MORTALITY; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; JAPAN; METHODOLOGY; NEUROSURGERY; NOTE; PATHOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE;

EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; JAPAN; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESEARCH DESIGN; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 18744367270     PISSN: 00223085     EISSN: 00223085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.4.0593     Document Type: Editorial

References (0)