Problem Set guidelines to facilitate ATR research, development, and performance assessments

Proceedings of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 4726, Issue , 2002, Pages 310-315

  Westerkamp, Lori ^a,f   Wild, Thomas ^a,f   Meredith, Donna ^b,f   Andrew Morrison, S ^c   Mossing, John C ^c,f   Avent, Randy ^d,f   Bergman, Annette ^e,f   Bruckheim, Arthur ^f   Castanon, David ^f,g   Corbett, Francis ^f,h   Hugo, Douglas ^f   Hummel, Robert ^f,i   Irvine, John ^f,j   Merle, Bruce ^f,k   Otto, Louis ^f,l   Reynolds, Robert ^f,j   Sadowski, Charles ^f   Schachter, Bruce ^f,m   Simonson, Kathy ^f,n   Smit, Gene ^f,n   Walters, Clare ^b,f   more..

^a AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b NIGHT VISION AND ELECTRONIC SENSORS DIRECTORATE   (United States)

^c JACOBS TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d MIT LINCOLN LABORATORY   (United States)

^e Naval Air Warfare Center (NAWCWPNS)   (United States)

^f Private Consultant ^*  (United States)

^g BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h Textron   (United States)

ⁱ DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY   (United States)

^j SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION   (United States)

^k BOEING COMPANY   (United States)

^l BAE SYSTEMS   (United States)

^m NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION   (United States)

ⁿ SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Algorithm Assessment; ATR Performance Prediction; ATRWG; DUSD; Experimentation; Problem Sets

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DATA REDUCTION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; RADAR CLUTTER;

PROBLEM SETS;

AUTOMATIC TARGET RECOGNITION;

EID: 18644383630     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1117/12.477039     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. ATRWG, "Problem Set Definitions for Automatic Target Recognition (ATR) Evaluation," (in progress).
2. ATRWG, "Target Recognizer Definitions and Performance Measures," ATRWG No. 86-001, February 1986.
3. ATRWG, "Appendix I to Automatic Target Recognizer Definitions and Performance Measures: ATR Truth Normalized Performance Measures Beyond Level 1 Discrimination," ATRWG No. 88-005.
4. ATRWG, "Applications of Confidence Intervals to ATR Performance Evaluation," ATRWG No. 88-006, October 1988.
5. Alan D. Kerrick, Atindra K. Mitra, Christopher N. Vogel, Travis R. Workman, "Operating Conditions for FOPEN Automatic Target Detection (U)", Tri-Services Radar Symposium, May 2001.
6. T.D. Ross, "Confidence Intervals for ATR Performance Metrics" Proc. SPIE, Vol. 4382, Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery VIII, April 2001.
7. T.D. Ross, J. Bradley, L. Hudson, M. O'Conner, "SAR ATR-So What's The Problem?-An MSTAR Perspective" Proc. SPIE, Vol. 3721, Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery VI, April 1999.
8. T.D. Ross and J.C. Mossing, "The MSTAR Evaluation Methodology" Proc. SPIE, Vol. 3721, Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery VI, April 1999.