Logistic map with a delayed feedback: Stability of a discrete time-delay control of chaos

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2001, Pages

  Buchner, T ^a   Zebrowski J J ^a  

^a WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18644382464     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.016210     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. K. Ikeda, Opt. Commun. 30, 257 (1979).
2. G. Giacomelli, R. Meucci, A. Politi, and F. T. Arecchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1099 (1994).
3. I. R. Epstein, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 1702 (1990).
4. M. C. Mackey and L. Glass, Science 197, 287 (1977).
5. S. Cavalcanti and E. Belardinelli, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 43, 982 (1996).
6. R. Hegger, M. J. Bünner, H. Kantz, and A. Giaquinta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 558 (1998).
7. H. Voss and J. Kurths, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 10, 805 (1999).
8. R. Hegger, Phys. Rev. E 60, 1563 (1999).
9. A. Fuliński and A. S. Kleczkowski, Phys. Scr. 35, 35 (1987).
10. J. L. Cabrera and F. J. Rubia, Phys. Lett. A 197, 19 (1995).
11. H. A. Lauwerier, Report Amst. Math. Centre, TW 245 (1983).
12. E. Fick, M. Fick, and G. Hausmann, Phys. Rev. A 44, 2469 (1991).
13. TDAS stands for time-delay autosynchronization; see K. Pyragas, Phys. Lett. A 170, 421 (1992), and references therein.
14. ETDAS stands for extended time-delay autosynchronization; see J. E. S. Socolar, D. W. Sukow, and D. J. Gauthier, Phys. Rev. E 50, 3245 (1994).
15. K. Konishi, M. Ishii, and H. Kokame, Phys. Rev. E 54, 3455 (1996).
16. J. E. S. Socolar and D. J. Gauthier, Phys. Rev. E 57, 6589 (1998).
17. T. Ushio and S. Yamamoto, Phys. Lett. A 247, 112 (1998).
18. M. D. Vieira and A. J. Lichtenberg, Phys. Rev. E 54, 1200 (1996).
19. E. Ott, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 655 (1981).
20. C. Grebogi, E. Ott, and J. A. Yorke, Physica D 24, 243 (1987).
21. W. Just, E. Reibold, H. Benner, K. Kacperski, P. Fronczak, and J. Holyst, Phys. Lett. A 254, 158 (1999), and references therein.
22. H. Nakajima and Y. Ueda, Physica D 111, 143 (1998).
23. J. E. S. Socolar and D. J. Gauthier, Phys. Rev. E 57, 6589 (1998).
24. C. Simmendinger, A. Wunderlin, and A. Pelster, Phys. Rev. E 59, 5344 (1999).
25. T. Ushio, IEEE Trans. CAS-I 43, 815 (1996).
26. H. Nakajima, Phys. Lett. A 232, 207 (1997).
27. R. M. May, Nature (London) 261, 459 (1976).
28. A. V. Oppenheim and R. W. Schafer, Digital Signal Processing (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1975).
29. M. F. Golnaraghi and F. C. Moon, Trans. ASME, J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. 113, 183 (1991).
30. K. Pyragas, Phys. Lett. A 170, 421 (1992).
31. J. D. Farmer, Physica D 4, 366 (1982).
32. J.-P. Eckmann and D. Ruelle, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 617 (1985).
33. M. Le Berre, E. Ressayre, A. Tallet, and H. M. Gibbs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 274 (1986).
34. G. R. Chen, J. L. Lu, B. Nicholas, and S. M. Ranganathan, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 9, 287 (1999).
35. Neimark bifurcation is a discrete-time analogue of the Hopf bifurcation appearing in flows; see e.g., J. M. T. Thompson and H. B. Stewart, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos (Wiley, Chichester, 1987).
36. Y. Morimoto, Phys. Lett. A 134, 179 (1988).
37. Preliminary numerical tests show that stability is possible for (Formula presented)
38. The free term of the equation (Formula presented) is equal to the product of λ taken with the sign dependent on the parity of D.
39. E. Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1993).
40. This is due to the fact that the eigenvalue of the logistic map is negative, so the feedback has an opposite sign to that of the map function itself. W. Jansen (private communication).
41. T. Buchner, Ph.D. thesis (in preparation).