Student perceptions of dual relationships between faculty and students

Ethics and Behavior

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 79-106

  Holmes, Deborah L ^a   Rupert, Patricia A ^a   Ross, Stephanie A ^a   Shapera, Wendy E ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Dual relationships; Higher education; Sexual harassment

Indexed keywords

EID: 18644378340     PISSN: 10508422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327019eb0902_1     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females' friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830-838.
2. Abbey, A., & Melby, C. (1986). The effects of nonverbal cues in gender differences in perceptions of sexual intent. Sex Roles, 15, 283-297.
3. Adams, J. W., Kottke, J. L., & Padgitt, J. S. (1983). Sexual harassment of university students. Journal of College Student Personnel, 24, 484-490.
4. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Biaggio, M., Paget, T. L., & Chenoweth, M. S. (1997). A model for ethical management of faculty-student dual relationships. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 184-189.
6. Blevins-Knabe, B. (1992). The ethics of dual relationships in higher education. Ethics and Behavior, 2, 151-163.
7. Borys, D. S., & Pope, K. S. (1989). Dual relationships between therapist and client: A national study of psychologist, psychiatrists, and social workers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 20, 283-293.
8. Bursik, K. (1992). Perception of sexual harassment in an academic context. Sex Roles, 27, 401-412.
9. Cleary, J. S., Schmeiler, C. R., Parascenzo, L. C., & Ambrosio, N. (1994). Sexual harassment of college students: Implications for campus health promotion. College Health, 43, 3-9.
10. Feldman-Summers, S. (1989). Sexual contact in fiduciary relationships. In G. O. Gabbard (Ed.), Sexual exploitation in professional relationships. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
11. Fitzgerald, L. F., & Hesson-McInnis, M. (1989). The dimensions of sexual harassment: A structural analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 35, 309-326.
12. Fitzgerald, L. F., & Ormerod, A. J. (1991). Perceptions of sexual harassment: The influence of gender and academic context. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 281-294.
13. Fitzgerald, L. F., Weitzman, L. M., Gold, Y., & Ormerod, M. (1988). Academic harassment: Sex and denial in scholarly garb. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 329-340.
14. Garlick, R. (1994). Male and female responses to ambiguous instructor behaviors. Sex Roles, 30, 135-158.
15. Glaser, R. D., & Thorpe, J. S. (1986). Unethical intimacy: A survey of sexual contact and advances between psychology educators and female graduate students. American Psychologist, 41, 43-51.
16. Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95-112.
17. Howell, D. C. (1997). Statistical methods for psychology (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury.
18. Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61, 509-532.
19. Kenig, S., & Ryan, J. (1986). Sex differences in levels of tolerance and attribution of blame for sexual harassment on a university campus. Sex Roles, 15, 535-548.
20. Kitchener, K. S. (1988). Dual role relationships: What makes them so problematic? Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 217-221.