Facial paralysis and surgical rehabilitation: A quality of life analysis in a cohort of 1,595 patients after acoustic neuroma surgery

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 516-521

  Ryzenman, John M ^a,b   Pensak, Myles L ^a,b   Tew Jr , John M ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^c MAYFIELD CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic neuroma; Acoustic Neuroma Association; Facial paralysis; Facial rehabilitation; Quality of life; Tumor size

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NEURINOMA; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COHORT ANALYSIS; COUNSELING; EYE DISEASE; FACIAL NERVE PARALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SCHOOL CHILD; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; COHORT STUDIES; FACIAL PARALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROMA, ACOUSTIC; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 18644375965     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000169786.22707.12     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Arriaga MA, Luxford WM, Berliner KI. Facial nerve function following middle fossa and translabyrinthine acoustic tumor surgery: a comparison. Am J Otol 1994;15:620-4.
2. Briggs RJ, Fabinyi G, Kaye AH. Current management of acoustic neuromas: review of surgical approaches and outcomes. J Clin Neurosci 2000;7:521-6.
3. Colletti V, Fiorino F. Middle fossa vs retrosigmoid-transmeatal approach in vestibular schwannoma surgery: a prospective study. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:927-4.
4. Fenton JE, Chin RY, Fagan PA, et al. Predictive factors of long-term facial nerve function after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:388-92.
5. Ho SY, Hudgens S, Wiet RJ. Comparison of postoperative facial nerve outcomes between translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approaches in matched-pair patients. Laryngoscope 2003;113:2014-20.
6. Irving RM, Jackler RK, Pitts LH. Hearing preservation in patients undergoing vestibular schwannoma surgery: comparison of middle fossa and retrosigmoid approaches. J Neurosurg 1998;88:840-5.
7. Lalwani AK, Butt FY, Jackler RK, et al. Facial nerve outcome after acoustic neuroma surgery: a study from the era of cranial nerve monitoring. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;111:561-70.
8. Mamikoglu B, Esquivel CR, Wiet RJ. Comparison of facial nerve function results after translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach in medium-sized tumors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:429-31.
9. Pollock BE, Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D, et al. Outcome analysis of acoustic neuroma management: a comparison of microsurgery and stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 1995;36:215-24.
10. Slattery WH III, Brackmann DE, Hitselberger W. Middle fossa approach for hearing preservation with acoustic neuromas. Am J Otol 1997;18:596-601.
11. Somers T, Offeciers FE, Schatteman I. Results of 100 vestibular schwannoma operations. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 2003;57:155-66.
12. Sood S, Anthony R, Homer JJ, et al. Hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis: assessment of clinical results and patient benefit for facial nerve palsy following acoustic neuroma excision. Clin Otolaryngol 2000;25:219-26.
13. Oghalai JS, Buxbaum JL, Pitts LH, Jackler RK. The effect of age on acoustic neuroma surgery outcomes. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:473-7.
14. Satar B, Yetiser S, Ozkaptan Y. Impact of tumor size on hearing outcome and facial function with the middle fossa approach for acoustic neuroma: a meta-analytic study. Acta Otolaryngol 2003;123:499-505.
15. Wiet RJ, Mamikoglu B, Odom L, Hoistad DL. Long-term results of the first 500 cases of acoustic neuroma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;124:645-51.
16. Rang TS, Vrabec JT, Giddings N, Terris DJ. Facial nerve grading systems (1985-2002): beyond the House-Brackmann scale. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:767-71.
17. Gidley PW, Gantz BJ, Rubinstein JT. Facial nerve grafts: from cerebellopontine angle and beyond. Am J Otol 1999;20:781-8.
18. Kahn JB, Gliklich RE, Boyev KP, et al. Validation of a patient-graded instrument for facial nerve paralysis: the FaCE scale. Laryngoscope 2001;111:387-98.
19. Hoffman WY. Reanimation of the paralyzed face. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1992;25:649-67.
20. Harrisberg BP, Singh RP, Croxson GR, et al. Long-term outcome of gold eyelid weights in patients with facial nerve palsy. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:397-400.
21. Snyder MC, Johnson PJ, Moore GF, Ogren FP. Early vs late gold weight implantation for rehabilitation of the paralyzed eyelid. Laryngoscope 2001;111:2109-13.
22. Levine RE, Shapiro JP. Reanimation of the paralyzed eyelid with the enhanced palpebral spring or the gold weight: modern replacements for tarsorrhaphy. Facial Plast Surg 2000;16:325-36.
23. Shumrick KA, Pensak ML. Early perioperative use of polytef suspension for the management of facial paralysis after extirpative skull base surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2000;2:243-8.
24. May M, Drucker C. Temporalis muscle for facial reanimation. A 13-year experience with 224 procedures. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;119:378-82.
25. Cheney ML, McKenna MJ, Megerian CA, Ojemann RG. Early temporalis muscle transposition for the management of facial paralysis. Laryngoscope 1995;105:993-1000.
26. Targan RS, Alon G, Kay SL. Effect of long-term electrical stimulation on motor recovery and improvement of clinical residuals in patients with unresolved facial nerve palsy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;122:246-52.
27. Diels HJ. Facial paralysis: is there a role for a therapist? Facial Plast Surg 2000;16:361-4.
28. Megerian CA, McKenna MJ, Ojemann RG. Delayed facial paralysis after acoustic neuroma surgery: factors influencing recovery. Am J Otol 1996;17:630-3.