Geometric morphometrics as a tool for understanding Dactylorhiza (Orchidaceae) diversity in European Russia

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-12

  Shipunov, Alexey B ^a   Bateman, Richard M ^b  

^a JODRELL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^b DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Developmental constraints; Diploid; Directional selection; Fluctuating asymmetry; Internal Transcribed Spacer; Landmarks; Tetraploid

Indexed keywords

GEOMETRY; MORPHOLOGY; TAXONOMY;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; WORLD;

DACTYLORHIZA; DACTYLORHIZA FUCHSII; DACTYLORHIZA INCARNATA; DACTYLORHIZA MACULATA; ORCHIDACEAE; ORCHIDINAE;

EID: 18644375602     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00468.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adams DC, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE. 2002. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the 'revolution'. Ecology and Evolution, SUNY, Stony Brook.
2. Alberch P, Gould SJ, Oster GF, Wake DB. 1979. Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 5: 296-317.
3. Averyanov LV. 1990. A review of genus Dactylorhiza Neck. ex Nevski (Orchidaceae), 3 [in Russian]. Novosti Sistematiki Vysshikh Rastenij 27: 32-62.
4. Bateman RM. 2001. Evolution and classification of European orchids: insights from molecular and morphological characters. Journal Europäischer Orchideen 33: 33-119.
5. Bateman RM, Denholm I. 1983. A reappraisal of the British and Irish dactylorchids, 1. The tetraploid marsh-orchids. Watsonia 14: 347-376.
6. Bateman RM, Denholm I. 1985. A reappraisal of the British and Irish dactylorchids, 2. The diploid marsh-orchids. Watsonia 15: 321-355.
7. Bateman RM, Denholm I. 1989. Morphometric procedure, taxonomic objectivity and marsh-orchid systematics. Watsonia 17: 449-455.
8. Bateman RM, Denholm I. 2003. The Heath Spotted-orchid (Dactylorhiza maculata (L.) Soó) in the British Isles: a cautionary case-study in delimiting infraspecific taxa and inferring their evolutionary relationships. Journal Europäischer Orchideen 35: 3-36.
9. Bateman RM, Hollingsworth PM. 2004. Morphological and molecular investigation of the parentage and maternity of Anacamptis x albuferensis (A. fragrans x A. robusta), a new hybrid orchid from Mallorca, Spain. Taxon 53: 43-54.
10. Bateman RM, Hollingsworth PM, Preston J, Luo Y-B, Pridgeon AM, Chase MW. 2003. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution of Orchidinae and selected Habenariinae (Orchidaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 142: 1-40.
11. Baylac M, Villemant C, Simbolotti G. 2003. Combining geometric morphometrics with pattern recognition for the investigation of species complexes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 80: 89-98.
12. Bookstein FL. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Chase MW. 1999. Molecular systematics, parsimony, and orchid classification. In: Pridgeon AM, Cribb PJ, Chase MW, Rasmussen FN, eds. Genera Orchidacearum. 1. General introduction, Apostasioideae, Cypripedioideae. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 81-88.
14. Cronk QCB, Bateman RM, Hawkins JA, eds. 2002. Developmental genetics and plant evolution. London: Taylor & Francis.
15. Delforge P. 1995. Orchids of Britain and Europe. London: Harper-Collins.
16. Guill JM, Heins DC, Hood CG. 2003. The effect of phylogeny on interspecific body shape variation in darters (Pisces: Percidae). Systematic Biology 52: 488-500.
17. Hedrén M. 2002. Speciation patterns in the Dactylorhiza incarnata/maculata polyploid complex (Orchidaceae): evidence from molecular markers. Journal Europäischer Orchideen 34: 707-731.
18. Hedrén M. 2003. Plastid DNA variation in the Dactylorhiza incarnata/maculata polyploid complex and the origin of allotetraploid D. sphagnicola (Orchidaceae). Molecular Ecology 12: 2669-2680.
19. Hedrén M, Fay MF, Chase MW. 2001. Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP) reveal details of polyploid evolution in Dactylorhiza (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 88: 1868-1880.
20. Heslop-Harrison J. 1948. Field studies in Orchis L., I. The structure of dactylorchid populations on certain islands in the Inner and Outer Hebrides. Transactions and Proceedings of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh 35: 26-66.
21. Heslop-Harrison J. 1951. A comparison of some Swedish and British forms of Orchis maculata L. sens lat. Svensk Botanisker Tidsskrift 45: 608-635.
22. Heslop-Harrison J. 1954. A synopsis of the dactylorchids of the British Isles. Beroff Geobotanische Forschung Institute Rübel 1953: 53-72.
23. Heslop-Harrison J. 1968. Genetic system and ecological habit as factors in dactylorchid variation. Jahresberichte Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Wuppertal 21-22: 20-27.
24. Jensen RJ, Ciofani KM, Miramontes LC. 2002. Lines, outlines and landmarks: morphometric analyses of leaves of Acer rubrum, Acer saccharinum (Aceraceae) and their hybrid. Taxon 51: 475-492.
25. Kores PJ, Molvray M, Darwin SP. 1993. Morphometric variation in three species of Cyrtostylis (Orchidaceae). Systematic Botany 18: 274-282.
26. MacLeod N, Forey P, eds. 2002. Morphology, shape and phylogenetics. Systematics Association Special Vol. 64. London: Taylor & Francis.
27. Nelson E. 1976. Monographie und Ikonographie der Orchidaceen-gattung, III. Dactylorhiza. Zürich: Published by the author.
28. Pavlinov IY. 2000. Geometric morphometrics of skull shape in some muroid rodents (Mammalia: Rodentia): relation of the skull shape to trophic specialization [in Russian, with English summary]. Journal of General Biology 61: 583-600.
29. Pavlinov IY. 2001. Geometric morphometrics, a new analytical approach to comparison of digitized images. Information Technology in Biodiversity Research: Abstracts of the 2nd International Symposium. St. Petersburg: Russian Academy of Science, 44-64.
30. Pedersen HA. 1998. Species concept and guidelines for infraspecific taxonomic ranking in Dactylorhiza (Orchidaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 18: 289-310.
31. Pillon Y, Fay MF, Hedrén M, Bateman RM, Devey D, van der Bank M, Chase MW. in press. Evolution and biogeography of European species complexes in Dactylorhiza (Orchidaceae). Taxon in press.
32. Ray TS. 1992. Landmark eigenshape analysis: homologous contours: leaf shape in Syngonium (Araceae). American Journal of Botany 79: 69-76.
33. Reinhard HR. 1990. Kritische anmerkungen zu einigen Dactylorhiza-arten (Orchidaceae) Europas. Mitteilungsblatt Arbeitskreise Heimische Orchideen Baden-Württemberg 22: 1-72.
34. Rohlf FJ. 2003a. tpsDig v. 1.39. Ecology and Evolution, SUNY, Stony Brook.
35. Rohlf FJ. 2003b. tpsRelw v. 1.35. Ecology and Evolution, SUNY, Stony Brook.
36. Rohlf FJ, Loy A, Corti M. 1996. Morphometric analysis of Old World Talpidae (Mammalia, Insectivora) using partial-warp scores. Systematic Biology 45: 344-362.
37. Rohlf FJ, Slice DE. 1990. Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology 39: 40-59.
38. Rudall PJ, Bateman RM, Fay MF, Eastman A. 2002. Floral anatomy and systematics of Alliaceae with particular reference to Gilliesia, a presumed insect mimic with strongly zygomorphic flowers. American Journal of Botany 89: 1867-1883.
39. Rueber L, Adams DC. 2001. Evolutionary convergence of body shape and trophic morphology in cichlids from Lake Tanganyika. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14: 325-332.
40. Shipunov AB, Fay MF, Pillon Y, Bateman RM, Chase MW. 2004. Dactylorhiza (Orchidaceae) in European Russia: combined molecular and morphological analysis. American Journal of Botany 91: 1419-1426.
41. Soó R. 1980. Dactylorhiza Necker ex Nevski. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA, eds. Flora Europaea, Vol. 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 333-337.
42. Stace CA. 1997. New flora of the British Isles, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Thompson DW. 1917. On growth and form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Tremblay RL, Ackerman JD, Zimmerman JK, Calvo RN. 2005. Variation in sexual reproduction in orchids and its evolutionary consequences: a spasmodic journey to diversification. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 84: 1-54.
45. Tyteca D, Gathoye JL. 2000. Morphometric analysis of the Dactylorhiza majalis group in France and western Europe, with a description of Dactylorhiza parvimajalis Tyteca et Gathoye, spec. nov. Journal Europäischer Orchideen 32: 471-511.
46. Venables WN, Smith DN, the R Development Core Team. 2002. An Introduction to R. Bristol: Network Theory Ltd.
47. Volkova PA, Jufrjakov IS, Shipunov AB. in press. The variability of different Drosera (Droseraceae) species revealed by classic and geometric morphometry. Bulletin of the Moscow Society of Naturalists, Biological Series in press.