Concurrence costs in non-speeded secondary tasks

Journal of Human Movement Studies

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 281-290

  Fischman, M G ^a   McAlister, R B ^a   Kinley, S J ^b  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention deficits; Divided attention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; WEIGHT LIFTING;

EID: 18644374252     PISSN: 03067297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. CREAMER, L. R. (1963). Event uncertainty, psychological refractory period, and human data processing. J. Exp. Psychol., 66: 187-194.
2. DAVIS, R. (1959). The role of "attention" in the psychological refractory period. Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 11: 211-220.
3. DESMURGET, M., GRÉA, H. AND PRABLANC, C. (1998). Final posture of the upper limb depends on the initial position of the hand during prehension movements. Exp. Brain Res., 119: 511-516.
4. DETWEILER, M. AND SCHNEIDER, W. (1991). Modeling the acquisition of dual task skill in a connectionist/control architecture. In Multiple Task Performance. Taylor and Francis, (Edited by D. L. Damos), Washington, D.C., pp 69-100.
5. KANTOWITZ, B. H. (1974A). Double stimulation. In Human Information Processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. Erlbaum, (Edited by B. H. Kantowitz), Hillsdale, NJ., pp 83-131.
6. KANTOWITZ, B. H. (1974B). Double stimulation with varying response requirements. J. Exp. Psychol., 103: 1092-1107.
7. KARLIN, L. AND KESTENBAUM, R. (1968). Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 20: 167-178.
8. NAVON, D. (1989A). The importance of being visible: On the role of attention in a mind viewed as an anarchic intelligence system: I. Basic tenets. Eur. J. Cognitive Psychol., 1: 191-213.
9. NAVON, D. (1989B). The importance of being visible: On the role of attention in a mind viewed as an anarchic intelligence system: II. Application to the field of attention. Eur. J. Cognitive Psychol., 1: 215-238.
10. NAVON, D. AND GOPHER, D. (1979). On the economy of the human processing system. Psychol. Rev., 86: 214-255.
11. NEUMANN, O. (1987). Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention. In Perspectives on Perception and Action. Erlbaum, (Edited by H. Heuer and A. F. Sanders), Hillsdale, NJ., pp 361-394.
12. NOBLE, M. E., SANDERS, A. F., AND TRUMBO, D. A. (1981). Concurrence costs in double stimulation tasks. Acta Psychologica, 49: 141-158.
13. PAULIGNAN, Y., FRAK, V. G., TONI, I. AND JEANNEROD, M. (1997). Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements. Exp. Brain Res., 114: 226-234.
14. PRYDE, K. M., ROY, E. A. AND CAMPBELL, K. (1998). Prehension in children and adults: The effects of object size. Hum. Movement Sci., 17: 743-752.
15. ROBY-BRAMI, A., BENNIS, N., MOKHTARI, M. AND BARADUC, P. (2000). Hand orientation for grasping depends on the direction of the reaching movement. Brain Res., 869: 121-129.
16. SANDERS, A. F. (1997). A summary of resource theories from a behavioral perspective. Biol. Psychol., 45: 5-18.
17. TELFORD, C. W. (1931). Refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. J. Exp. Psychol., 14: 1-35.
18. WELFORD, A. T. (1967). Single-channel operation in the brain. Acta Psychologica, 27: 5-22.
19. WELFORD, A. T. (1980). The single channel hypothesis. In Reaction Times. Academic Press, (Edited by A. T. Welford), London, UK., pp 215-252.
20. ZAAL, F. T. J. M. AND BOOTSMA, R. J. (1993). Accuracy demands in natural prehension. Hum. Movement Sci., 12: 339-345.