Assessment of feasibility of workplace health promotion

Preventive Medicine

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 232-240

  Partanen, Timo ^a,b   Johansson, Mauri ^c   Ahrens, Wolfgang ^d   Sala, Maria ^e   Wesseling, Catharina ^b   Boffetta, Paolo ^f   Brenes, Freddy ^g   Font, Carmen ^h   Frentzel Beyme, Rainer ^d   Garau, Isabel ⁱ   Janer, Gemma ^j   Kallas Tarpila, Tarja ^a   Kogevinas, Manolis ^j   Loponen, Minna ^a   Østergren, Laila ^a   Peltomäki, Päivi ^a   Dolores Solér, Maria ^k   Svanström, Leif ^c   Tempel, Jürgen ^l   Neuvonen, Kaisa ^a,m  

^a FINNISH INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL   (Costa Rica)

^c KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^d LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR PREVENTION RESEARCH AND EPIDEMIOLOGY BIPS   (Germany)

^e Municipality of Sabadell ^*  (Spain)

^f INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER   (France)

^g INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO DE COSTA RICA   (Costa Rica)

^h Direct Gen for Occupational Health   (Spain)

ⁱ UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

^j INST MUNIC D INVESTIGACIO MEDICA   (Spain)

^k National Institute for Occupational Safety and Hygiene ^*  (Spain)

^l Workplace Health Promotion   (Germany)

^m TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

more..

Author keywords

Acceptability; Cancer; Hazards; Needs; Prevention; Social context

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER RISK; CATERING SERVICE; CONSTRUCTION WORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMPLOYEE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INDUSTRY; INTERVIEW; LIFESTYLE; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL HAZARD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; TEACHING; TELECOMMUNICATION; TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT; WORKPLACE;

EID: 18644370003     PISSN: 00917435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2002.1065     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Fielding JE. Health promotion and disease prevention at the worksite. Annu Rev Public Health 1984;5:237-65.
2. DeJoy DM, Southern DJ. An integrative perspective on work-site health promotion. J Occup Med 1993;35:1221-30.
3. Baker E, Israel BA, Schurman S. The integrated model: implications for worksite health promotion and occupational health and safety practice. Health Educ Q 1996;23:175-90.
4. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Workplace Health Promotion in Europe: programme summary. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1997.
5. Sorensen G, Stoddard A, Peterson K, Cohen N, Hunt MK, Stein E, et al. Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption through worksites and families in the Treatwell 5-a-Day study. Am J Public Health 1999;89:54-60.
6. Emmons KM. Health behaviors in a social context. In: Berkman LF, Kawachi I, editors. Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2000:242-66.
7. Bracht N, Tsouros A. Principles and strategies of effective community participation. Health Promot Int 1990;5:199-208.
8. Means R, Harrison L, Jeffers S, Smith R. Co-ordination, collaboration and health promotion: lessons and issues from an alcohol education programme. Health Promot Int 1991;6:31-40.
9. Bjärås G, Haglund BJA, Rifkin SB. A new approach to community participation assessment. Health Promot Int 1991;6:199-206.
10. Pucci LG, Haglund B. 'Naturally Smoke Free': a support program for facilitating worksite smoking control policy implementation in Sweden. Health Promot Int 1994;9:177-87.
11. Davies R. Reflections on the role of business in health promotion and the challenge of partnership. Health Promot Int 1998;13:183-5.
12. Gillies P. Effectiveness of alliances and partnership for health promotion. Health Promot Int 1998;13:99-210.
13. Buchanan DR. An ethic for health promotion: rethinking the sources of human well-being. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
14. Boffetta P, Kogevinas M, Simonato L, Wilbourn J, Saracci R. Current perspectives on occupational cancer risks. Int J Occup Environ Health 1995;1:315-25.
15. http://www.iarc.fr/, click Cancer Databases; IARC Monographs.