Knowledge discovery in complex objects

Computational Intelligence

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 28-49

  Faïd, Mourad ^a   Missaoui, Rokia ^a   Godin, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Complex objects; Concatenation of contexts; Concept lattice; Implication rule generation; Knowledge discovery

Indexed keywords

LEARNING SYSTEMS; LINGUISTICS;

COMPLEX OBJECTS; CONCATENATION PRODUCT; KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

EID: 18644368583     PISSN: 08247935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0824-7935.00080     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. ABITEBOUL, S., R. HULL, and V. VIANU. 1995. Foundations of Databases. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
2. ATZENI, P., and V. DE ANTONELLIS. 1993. Relational Database Theory. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing, Redwood City, CA.
3. BROOKES, B. C. 1968. The derivation and application of the Bradford-Zipf distribution. Journal of Documentation, 24(4):247-265.
4. CHEN, M-S. Y., J. HAN, and S. PHILIP. 1996. Data mining: An overview from database perspective. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 8(6):866-883.
5. CHU, S., and G. ELLIS. 1996. Investigating lattice techniques for organizing document collections. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Conceptual Structures.
6. DAVEY, B. A., and H. A. PRIESTLEY. 1990. Introduction to Lattices and Order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
7. ELLIS, G. 1995. Managing complex objects. Ph.D. thesis, Computer Science Department, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia; http://www.cs.rmit.edu.au/̃ged/publications.html.
8. FAÏD, M., R. MISSAOUI, and R. GODIN. 1997. Mining complex structures using context concatenation in formal concept analysis. In Proceedings of the Second International KRUSE Symposium, Vancouver.
9. FAYYAD, U. M. et al. 1996. The KDD process for extracting useful knowledge from volumes of data. Comm. of the ACM, 39(11):27-34.
10. FAYYAD, U. M. 1997. Editorial. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Journal, 1(1):5-10.
11. GANTER, B. 1996. Attribute exploration with background knowledge. In Proceedings of the Conference on Order and Decision-Making, Ottawa.
12. GANTER, B., and R. WILLE. 1998. Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Springer-Verlag.
13. GODIN, R., and R. MISSAOUI. 1994. An incremental concept formation approach for learning from databases. In Theoretical Computer Science; Special Issue on Formal Methods in Databases and Software Engineering, 133:387-419.
14. GODIN, R., R. MISSAOUI, and H. ALAOUI. 1995. Incremental concept formation algorithms based on Galois (concept) lattices. Computational Intelligence, 11(2):246-267.
15. GUIGUES, J. L., and V. DUQUENNE. 1986. Families minimales d'implications informatives résultant d'un tableau de données binaires. Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines, 95:5-18.
16. KENT, R. E. 1996. The WAVE system. In WebNet'96. October 15-19, 1996. http:/wave.eecs.wsu.edu/WAVE/.
17. KOPERSKI, K., and J. HAN. 1995. Discovery of spatial association rules in geographic information DBs. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Large Spatial Databases, SSD'95, Portland, Maine, pp. 47-66.
18. NG, R., and J. HAN. 1994. Efficient and Effective Clustering Method for Spatial Data Mining. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases, Santiago, Chile, pp. 144-155.
19. VOGT, F., and R. WILLE. 1995. Toscana: A Graphical Tool Analysing and Exploring Data. In Graph drawings. Edited by R. Tamassia & I. G. Tollis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 226-233.
20. WILLE, R. 1982. Restructuring lattice theory: An approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In Ordered Sets. Edited by I. Rival. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 445-470.
21. WILLE, R. 1996. Conceptual structures of multicontexts. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Conceptual Structures ICCS'96, Sydney, Australia, pp. 23-39.