In utero bone marrow transplantation induces kidney allograft tolerance across a full major histocompatibilty complex barrier in swine

Transplantation

Volumn 79, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1084-1090

  Lee, Patricia W ^a,b   Cina, Robert A ^a   Randolph, Mark A ^a   Arellano, Ron ^a   Goodrich, Jennifer ^a   Rowland, Haley ^a   Huang, Christene A ^a   Sachs, David H ^a   Kim, Heung Bae ^a,b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Chimerism; Fetal tolerance; In utero bone marrow transplantation; Kidney transplantation; Miniature swine

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTIBODY PRODUCTION; BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION; CHIMERA; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLYSIS; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; IMMUNOASSAY; KIDNEY ALLOGRAFT; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MIXED LYMPHOCYTE REACTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWINE;

ANIMALS; BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION; CREATININE; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GRAFT SURVIVAL; IMMUNE TOLERANCE; ISOANTIBODIES; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LYMPHOCYTE CULTURE TEST, MIXED; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MODELS, ANIMAL; PREGNANCY; SWINE; SWINE, MINIATURE; TRANSPLANTATION TOLERANCE; TRANSPLANTATION, HOMOLOGOUS;

EID: 18644366949     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000161247.61727.67     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Rubin JP, Cober SR, Butler PE, et al. Injection of allogeneic bone marrow cells into the portal vein of swine in utero. J Surg Res 2001; 95(2): 188.
2. Mathes DW, Yamada K, Randolph MA, et al. In utero induction of transplantation tolerance. Transplant Proc 2001; 33(1-2): 98.
3. Lee PW, Cina RA, Randolph MA, et al. Stable multilineage chimerism across full MHC barriers without graft-versus-host disease following in utero bone marrow transplantation in pigs. Exp Hematol 2005; 33(3): 371.
4. Sachs DH, Leight G, Cone J, et al. Transplantation in miniature swine: I. Fixation of the major histocompatibility complex. Transplantation 1976; 22(6): 559.
5. Fuchimoto Y, Huang C, Shimizu A, et al. An allelic non-histocompatibility antigen with wide tissue distribution as a marker for chimerism in pigs. Tissue Antigens 1999; 54(1): 43.
6. Huang CA, Lorf T, Arn JS, et al. Characterization of a monoclonal anti-porcine CD3 antibody. Xenotransplantation 1999; 6(3): 201.
7. Pescovitz MD, Lunney JK, Sachs DH. Preparation and characterization of monoclonal antibodies reactive with porcine PBL. J Immunol 1984; 133(1): 368.
8. Ozato K, Mayer N, Sachs DH. Hybridoma cell lines secreting monoclonal antibodies to mouse H-2 and Ia antigens. J Immunol 1980; 124(2): 533.
9. Gianello PR, Fishbein JM, Rosengard BR, et al. Tolerance to class I-disparate renal allografts in miniature swine: Maintenance of tolerance despite induction of specific antidonor CTL responses. Transplantation 1995; 59(5): 772.
10. Colvin RB. The renal allograft biopsy. Kidney Int 1996; 50(3): 1069.
11. Owen RD. Immunogenetic consequences of vascular anastomoses between bovine twins. Science 1945; 102: 400.
12. Benirschke K, Anderson JM, Brownhill LE. Marrow chimerism in marmosets. Science 1962; 138: 513.
13. Gill TJ. Chimerism in humans. Transplant Proc 1977; 9(2): 1423.
14. Billingham RE, Brent L, Medawar PB. 'Actively acquired tolerance' of foreign cells. Nature 1953; 172: 603.
15. Kline GM, Shen Z, Mohiuddin M, et al. Development of tolerance to experimental cardiac allografts in utero. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 57(1): 72.
16. Kim HB, Shaaban AF, Yang EY, et al. Microchimerism and tolerance after in utero bone marrow transplantation in mice. J Surg Res 1998; 77(1): 1.
17. Carrier E, Gilpin E, Lee TH, et al. Microchimerism does not induce tolerance after in utero transplantation and may lead to the development of alloreactivity. J Lab Clin Med 2000; 136(3): 224.
18. Hedrick MH, Rice HE, MacGillivray TE, et al. Hematopoietic chimerism achieved by in utero hematopoietic stem cell injection does not induce donor-specific tolerance for renal allografts in sheep. Transplantation 1994; 58(1): 110.
19. Mychaliska GB, Rice HE, Tarantal AF, et al. In utero hematopoietic stem cell transplants prolong survival of postnatal kidney transplantation in monkeys. J Pediatr Surg 1997; 32(7): 976.
20. Binns RM. Bone marrow and lymphoid cell injection of the pig foetus resulting in transplantation tolerance or immunity, and immunoglobulin production. Nature 1967; 214(84): 179.
21. Binns RM, Calne RY, Millard PR. Induced tolerance of a kidney allograft in a pig: Preliminary report. Eur Surg Res 1970; 2(6): 408.
22. Rosengard BR, Ojikutu CA, Guzzetta PC, et al. Induction of specific tolerance to class I-disparate renal allografts in miniature swine with cyclosporine. Transplantation 1992; 54(3): 490.
23. Gianello PR, Sachs DH. Effect of major histocompatibility complex matching on the development of tolerance to primarily vascularized renal allografts: A study in miniature swine. Hum Immunol 1996; 50(1): 1.
24. Bellotti M, Pennati G, De Gasperi C, et al. Role of ductus venosus in distribution of umbilical blood flow in human fetuses during second half of pregnancy. Am J Physiol 2000; 279(3): H1256.
25. Barnes RJ, Comline RS, Dobson A, et al. On the presence of a ductus venosus in the fetal pig in late gestation. J Dev Physiol 1979; 1(2): 105.