Intraocular pressure measurement in patients with previous LASIK surgery using pressure phosphene tonometer

Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 153-157

  Cheng, Arthur C K ^a   Leung, Dexter Y L ^a   Cheung, Eva Y Y ^a   Fan, Dorothy S P ^a   Law, Ricky W K ^a   Lam, Dennis S C ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Intraocular pressure; LASIK; Pressure phosphene tonometry; Refractive surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOMILEUSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MYOPIA; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRESSURE PHOSPHENE TONOMETER; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; TONOMETER;

ADULT; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MIDDLE AGED; MYOPIA; PHOSPHENES; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 18644365858     PISSN: 14426404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2005.00988.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Fournier AV, Podtetenev M, Lemire J et al. Intraocular pressure change measured by Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998; 24: 905-10.
2. Zadok D, Tran DB, Twa M, Carpenter M, Schanzlin DJ. Pneumotonometry versus Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25: 1344-8.
3. El Danasoury MA, El Maghraby A, Coorpender SJ. Change in intraocular pressure in myopic eyes measured with contact and non-contact tonometers after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 2001; 17: 97-104.
4. Rashad KM, Bahnassy AA. Changes in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 2001; 17: 420-7.
5. Duch S, Serra A, Castanera J, Abos R, Quintana M. Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis treatment. J Glaucoma 2001; 10: 261-5.
6. Vakili R, Choudhri SA, Tauber S, Shields MB. Effect of mild to moderate myopic correction by laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis on intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometer, tono-pen, and pneumatonometer. J Glaucoma 2002; 11: 493-6.
7. Emara B, Probst LE, Tingey DP, Kennedy DW, Willms LJ, Machat J. Correlation of intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness in normal myopic eyes and after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998; 24: 1320-5.
8. Burvenich H, Sallet G, De Clercq J. The correlation between IOP measurement, central corneal thickness and corneal curvature. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 2000; 276: 23-6.
9. Recep OF, Cagil N, Hasiripi H. Correlation between intraocular pressure and corneal stromal thickness after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26: 1480-3.
10. Lee DH, Seo S, Shin SC, Chung EH, Turner TT. Accuracy and predictability of the compensatory function of Orbscan II in intraocular pressure measurements after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: 259-64.
11. Davidson RS, Brandt JD, Mannis MJ. Intraocular pressure-induced interlamellar keratitis after LASIK surgery. J Glaucoma 2003; 12: 23-6.
12. Cheng ACK, Law RWK, Young ALY, Lam DSC. In vivo confocal microscopic findings in patients with steroid-induced glaucoma after LASIK. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 768-74.
13. Belin MW, Hannush SB, Yau CW, Schultze RL. Elevated intraocular pressure-induced interlamellar stromal keratitis. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 1929-33.
14. Fresco BB. A new tonometer - the pressure phosphene tonometer: clinical comparison with Goldmann tonometry. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 2123-6.
15. Kass MA. Standardizing the measurements of intraocular pressure for clinical research. Guidelines from the eye care technology forum. Ophthalmology 1996; 103: 183-5.
16. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-10.
17. Ramakrishnan R, Nirmalan PK, Krishnadas R et al. Glaucoma in a rural population of southern India: the Aravind comprehensive eye survey. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 1484-90.
18. Kroese M, Burton H, Vardy S, Rimmer T, McCarter D. Prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma in general ophthalmic practice in the United Kingdom. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 978-80.
19. Quigley HA, West SK, Rodriguez J, Munoz B, Klein R, Snyder R. The prevalence of glaucoma in a population-based study of Hispanic subjects: Proyecto VER. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 1819-26.
20. Weih LM, Nanjan M, McCarty CA, Taylor HR. Prevalence and predictors of open-angle glaucoma: results from the visual impairment project. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 1966-72.
21. Yoshida M, Okada E, Mizuki N et al. Age-specific prevalence of open-angle glaucoma and its relationship to refraction among more than 60 000 asymptomatic Japanese subjects. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54: 1151-8.
22. David R, Zangwill L, Briscoe D, Dagan M, Yagev R, Yassur Y. Diurnal intraocular pressure variations: an analysis of 690 diurnal curves. Br J Ophthalmol 1992; 76; 280-3.
23. De Venecia G, Davis MD. Diurnal variation of intraocular pressure in the normal eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1963; 69: 752-7.
24. Drance SM. Diurnal variation of intraocular pressure in treated glaucoma: significance in patients with chronic simple glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1963; 70: 302-11.
25. Kitazawa Y, Horie T. Diurnal variation of intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1975; 79: 557-66.
26. Lam DSC, Leung D, Chiu T et al. Pressure phosphene self-tonometry: a comparison with Goldmann tonometry in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 3131-6.
27. Naruse S, Mori K, Kojo M, Hieda O, Kinoshita S. Evaluation of intraocular pressure change after laser in situ keratomileusis using the pressure phosphene tonometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 390-7.
28. Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 746-51.