Odor to sensor space transformations in biological and artificial noses

Neurocomputing

Volumn 32-33, Issue , 2000, Pages 941-952

  Pearce, T C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Artificial nose; Olfaction; Population coding

Indexed keywords

ARRAYS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

ARTIFICIAL NOSE; ELECTRONIC NOSE; OLFACTION; POPULATION CODING;

CHEMICAL SENSORS;

ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CODING; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRONICS; NOSE; ODOR; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR; OLFACTORY SYSTEM; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSOR; SENSORY SYSTEM; STIMULUS;

EID: 18544406657     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0925-2312(00)00264-2     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Buck L., Axel R. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors - a molecular-basis for odor recognition. Cell. 65:1991;175-187.
2. Pearce T.C. Computational parallels between the biological olfactory pathway and its analogue the electronic nose: Part II. Sensor-based machine olfaction. Biosystems. 41:1997;69-90.
3. T.C. Pearce, J.R. Wicks, Optimisation measures for chemical sensing arrays: a geometric approach, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, in press.
4. Theunissen F.E., Miller J.P. Representation of sensory information in the cricket cercal sensory system. II. Information theoretic calculation of system accuracy and optimal tuning-curve widths of four primary interneurons. J. Neurophysiol. 66:1991;1690-1703.