Configuring Online Problem-Solving Resources with the Internet Reasoning Service

IEEE Intelligent Systems

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 34-42

  Crubézy, Monica ^a   Motta, Enrico ^b   Lu, Wenjin ^c   Musen, Mark A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEURISTIC METHODS; INTERNET; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES; USER INTERFACES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

INTELLIGENT BROKERING; INTERNET REASONING SERVICE; KNOWLEDGE BASED APPLICATIONS; ONLINE PROBLEM SOLVING RESOURCES; SERVICE PROVIDING RESOURCES; SERVICE PROVISION;

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

EID: 18544401148     PISSN: 15411672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/MIS.2003.1193655     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. V.R. Benjamins et al., “An Intelligent Brokering Service for Knowledge-Component Reuse on the World-Wide Web,” Proc. 11th Workshop Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management (KAW 98), Univ. Calgary, 1998; http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/KAW/KAW98/ KAW98Proc.html.
2. J. McDermott, “Preliminary Steps toward a Taxonomy of Problem-Solving Methods,” Automatic Knowledge for Acquisition for Expert Systems, S. Marcus, ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988, pp. 225-254.
3. H. Eriksson et al., “Task Modeling with Reusable Problem-Solving Methods,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 79, no. 2, Dec. 1995, pp. 293-326.
4. D. Fensel and E. Motta, “Structured Development of Problem Solving Methods,” IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Eng., vol. 13, no. 6, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 913-932.
5. E. Motta, Reusable Components for Knowledge Modelling: Principles and Case Studies in Parametric Design, IOS Press, 1999.
6. B. Chandrasekaran, “Generic Tasks for Knowledge-Based Reasoning: High-Level Building Blocks for Expert System Design,” IEEE Expert, vol. 1, no. 3, Fall 1986, pp. 23-30.
7. M.A. Musen et al., “Component-Based Support for Building Knowledge-Acquisition Systems,” Proc. Conf. Intelligent Information Processing (IIP 2000) of the Int'l Federation for Information Processing World Computer Congress (WCC 2000), 2000, pp. 18-22; www-smi.stanford.edu/pubs/SMI_Reports/ SMI-2000-0838.pdf.
8. A.T. Schreiber et al., Knowledge Engineering and Management: The CommonKADS Methodology, MIT Press, 2000.
9. D. Fensel et al., “The Unified Problem-Solving Method Development Language UPML,” Knowledge and Information Systems J., vol. 5, no. 1, Jan. 2003.
10. B. Omelayenko et al., “UPML: The Language and Tool Support for Making the Semantic Web Alive,” Spinning the Semantic Web: Bringing the World Wide Web to Its Full Potential, D. Fensel et al., eds., MIT Press, 2003, pp. 141-170.
11. J.Y. Park, J.H. Gennari, and M.A. Musen, “Mappings for Reuse in Knowledge-Based Systems,” Proc. 11th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, Univ. Calgary, 1998; http://ksi.cpsc. ucalgary.ca/KAW/KAW98/KAW98Proc.html.
12. J. Domingue, “Tadzebao and WebOnto: Discussing, Browsing, and Editing Ontologies on the Web,” Proc. 11th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, Univ. Calgary, 1998; http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary. ca/KAW/KAW98/KAW98Proc.html.