Anharmonic properties of the double giant dipole resonance

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 85, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 1400-1403

  Ponomarev, V Yu ^a,b   Bortignon, P F ^a   Broglia, R A ^a,c   Voronov, V V ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b JOINT INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH   (Russian Federation)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; ATOMS; CALCIUM; ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; GROUND STATE; LEAD; NUMERICAL METHODS; PHONONS; RESONANCE; XENON;

ANHARMONIC PROPERTIES; DOUBLE GIANT DIPOLE RESONANCE; NUCLEI; QUASIPARTICLE RANDOM PHASE APPROXIMATION;

NUCLEAR PHYSICS;

EID: 18544399754     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1400     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. G. D. Mahan, Many-Particle Physics (Plenum, New York, 1983).
2. P. F. Bortignon, A. Bracco, and R. A. Broglia, Giant Resonances, Nuclear Structure at Finite Temperature (Harwood Academic, New York, 1998).
3. G. F. Bertsch and R. A. Broglia, Finite Quantum Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994).
4. D. Pines, Elementary Excitations in Solid (Benjamin, New York, 1963).
5. D. Pines and P. Nozieres, The Theory of Quantum Liquids (Benjamin, New York, 1966).
6. A. M. Lane, Nuclear Theory (Benjamin, New York, 1964).
7. P. Ring and P. Schuck, The Nuclear Many-Body Problem (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1980).
8. G. D. Mahan and K. R. Subbaswamy, Local Density Theory of Polarizability (Plenum Press, New York, 1990).
9. D. Bohm and D. Pines, Phys. Rev. 92, 609 (1953).
10. H. Haberland, Nucl. Phys. A649, 415c (1999).
11. T. Aumann, P. F. Bortignon, and H. Emling, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 48, 351 (1998).
12. It can be argued that much work concerning this subject has been carried out (cf., e.g., Refs. [13] and [14]), in particular, in connection with the study of the low-lying vibrations of nuclei [15]. While this is true, the comparison between theories developed to deal with the associated violations of Pauli principle, like, e.g., nuclear field theory (cf., e.g., [16] and references therein) or quasiparticle-phonon model [17], and the experiment has been, in many cases, blurred by the (relatively) small phase space available to the nucleons in the low-lying vibrations, and the role specific single-particle orbits play in determining the properties of the modes.
13. P. W. Anderson, Basic Notions of Condensed Matter (Benjamin, Menlo Park, 1984).
14. C. P. Enz, A Course on Many-Body Theory Applied to Solid-State Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992).
15. A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure (Benjamin, New York, 1975), Vol. 2.
16. P. F. Bortignon, R. A. Broglia, D. R. Bes, and R. Liotta, Phys. Rep. 30, 305 (1977).
17. V. G. Soloviev, Theory of Atomic Nuclei: Quasiparticles and Phonons (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, 1992).
18. H. Emling, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 33, 729 (1994).
19. S. Mordechai and C. F. Moore, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 3, 39 (1994).
20. P. Chomaz and N. Frascaria, Phys. Rep. 252, 275 (1995).
21. C. A. Bertulani and V. Yu. Ponomarev, Phys. Rep. 321, 139 (1999).
22. A. Winther and K. Adler, Nucl. Phys. A319, 518 (1979).
23. H. Kurasawa and T. Suzuki, Nucl. Phys. A597, 374 (1996).
24. F. Catara, Ph. Chomaz, and N. Van Giai, Phys. Lett. B 233, 6 (1989).
25. V. Yu. Ponomarev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1168 (1994).
26. S. Nishizaki and J. Wambach, Phys. Lett. B 349, 7 (1995); Phys. Rev. C 57, 1515 (1998).
27. S. Nishizaki and J. Wambach, Phys. Lett. B 349, 7 (1995); Phys. Rev. C 57, 1515 (1998).
28. C. Volpe et al., Nucl. Phys. A589, 521 (1995); A647, 246 (1999).
29. C. Volpe et al., Nucl. Phys. A589, 521 (1995); A647, 246 (1999).
30. V. Yu. Ponomarev, P. F. Bortignon, R. A. Broglia, and V. V. Voronov, Z. Phys. A 356, 251 (1996).
31. V. Yu. Ponomarev and C. A. Bertulani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3853 (1997).
32. P. F. Bortignon and C. H. Dasso, Phys. Rev. C 56, 574 (1997).
33. G. F. Bertsch and H. Feldmeier, Phys. Rev. C 56, 839 (1997).
34. E. G. Lanza et al., Nucl. Phys. A613, 445 (1997).
35. I. Hamamoto, Phys. Rev. C 60, 054320 (1999).
36. G. F. Bertsch, P. F. Bortignon, and K. Hagino, Nucl. Phys. A657, 59 (1999).
37. As a matter of fact and strictly speaking, such a conclusion must wait the explicit calculation of the ratio of the Coulomb excitation cross section associated with the (mainly) two-phonon and (mainly) one-phonon states. In fact, to avoid the complications of combining nuclear structure with nuclear reaction theories to eventually carry out a comparison with the experimental data, and be able to extract, in the simplest way, the A dependence of the two-phonon anharmonicities, we have avoided explicit reference to the one-phonon states. In keeping with the fact that the coupling to one-phonon states leads only to a breaking of the strength (damping width), but not to a change in the energy centroid, we are able to concentrate on the central issue which is at the basis of the DGDR energy centroid shift from the harmonic value, namely, the modification of the phonon structure due to Pauli principle corrections.
38. -1.
39. D. R. Bes, R. A. Broglia, G. C. Dussel, R. J. Liotta, and H. M. Sofia, Nucl. Phys. A260, 1 (1976).
40. D. R. Bes and R. A. Sorensen, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 2, 129 (1969).
41. D. R. Bes, G. C. Dussel, R. A. Broglia, R. J. Liotta, and B. R. Mottelson, Phys. Lett. 52B, 253 (1974).