Influence of the position of the mother at delivery over some maternal and neonatal outcomes

International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 63, Issue SUPPL. 1, 1998, Pages

  Bomfim Hyppolito S ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF CEARÁ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Apgar score; Birthing position; Blood loss; Perineal lacerations; Second stage of labor

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; BLEEDING; CONFERENCE PAPER; EPISIOTOMY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INCIDENCE; LABOR; LACERATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT POSITIONING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUCKLING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 18544391707     PISSN: 00207292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00186-6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Cabral de Lima R. Contribuição para o estudo e pesquisa de uma parturição transpélvica traumatizante. Maceió, 1980:19.
2. Caldeyro-Barcia R. Physiological and psychological bases for the modern and humanized management of normal labor. Lecture presented at the Symposium on 'Recent Progress in Perinatal Medicine', sponsored by the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, October 21 and 22, 1979, Scientific Publication no. 858 of the Latin American Center of Perinatology and Human Development, PAHO/WHO, 1979.
3. Caldeyro-Barcia R, Noriega-Guerra L, Cibils LAet al. Effect of position changes on the intensity and frequency of uterine contractions during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 80:1960;284-290.
4. Chen S-Z, Aisaka K, Mori H, Kigawa T Effects of sitting position on uterine activity during labor. Obstet Gynecol. 69:1987;67-73.
5. Argentine Episiotomy Trial Collaborative Group Routine vs. selective episiotomy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 342:1993;1517-1518.
6. Araújo JG, Araujo L, Janowitz B, Wallace S, Pott M Improving obstetric care in northeast Brazil. Bull Pan Am Health Org. 17:1993;233-242.
7. Bieniarz J, Crottogini JJ, Curuchet E, Romero Salinas G, Yoshida T, Poseiro JJet al. Aortocaval compression by the uterus in late human pregnancy. II. An arteriographic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 100:1968;203-217.
8. Abitbol MM Supine position in labor and associated fetal heart rate changes. Obstet Gynecol. 65:1985;481-486.
9. Díaz AG, Scwarcz R, Caldeyro-Barcia R. La posición vertical de la embarazada durante el trabajo de parto y sus efectos sobre el progreso del parto y el neonato. Investigación colaborativa entre maternidades de América Latina. Primer Informe. Publicación Científica #703, CLAP, 1977.
10. Olson R, Olson C, Cox NS Maternal birthing positions and perineal injury. J Family Pract. 30:1990;553-557.
11. Rezende J, et al. Obstetrícia I, 6th ed. Rio de Janeiro, Editora Guanabara Koogan, 1991:1117.
12. Larsson P, Platz-Christensen J, Bergman B, Wallsterson G Advantage or disadvantage of episiotomy compared with spontaneous perineal laceration. Obstet Gynecol Invest. 31:1991;213-216.
13. Sabatino H, Barini R, Giraldo PC Repercussão perinatal do parto atendido em posição de cócoras. Rev Bras Ginecfol Obstet. 6:1984;7-14.
14. Humphrey MD, Chang A, Wood EC, Morgan S, Hounslow D A decrease in fetal pH during the second stage of labour, when conducted in the dorsal position. J Obstet Gynecol Br Commonw. 81:1974;600-602.
15. Odell LD, Seski A Episiotomy blood loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 54:1947;51-56.
16. Araujo J. Minha experiência com as parteiras e as rezadeiras do Ceará, a busca da integração do conhecimento tradicional. Contact. Comissão Médica Cristã do Conselho Mundial das Igrejas - Genebra, 1983;8:3-12. Edição em português.
17. Frager NB, Miyazak FS Intrauterine monitoring of contractions during breast stimulation. Obstet Gynecol. 69:1987;767-769.