Integration of technology and facility design: Implications for nursing administration

Journal of Nursing Administration

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 217-219

  Watson, Carol A ^a,b,c  

^a CNO   (United States)

^b AONE Institute for Patient Care Research and Education   (United States)

^c Mercy Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MODEL; NURSE; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; NURSING; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; RESEARCH; REVIEW; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; HOSPITAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION; HUMANS; JOB SATISFACTION; NURSING CARE; SOCIETIES, NURSING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 18544384088     PISSN: 00020443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. American Organization of Nurse Executives. AONE 2005 education and research priorities. December 4, 2004. Available at: www.aone.org/aone/ edandcareer/priorities.html. Accessed February 1, 2005.
2. Gillette B. Wireless technology serves as next logical step in care service. Managed Healthcare Executive. June 2004. Available at: www.managed healthcareexecutive.com/mhe/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=100491. Accessed February 1, 2005.
3. NOP World-Technology. Wireless LANS Benefits Study. September 2001. Available at: http://www.nop world.com/case.asp?go=ll. Accessed February 1, 2005.
4. First Consulting Group. Vocera Communications: Vocera benefits study at St. Agnes hospital. February 2004. Available at: www.vocera.com/pdf/ StAgnes_Whitepaper_FINAL.pdf. Accessed February 1, 2005.
5. Rough S, Ludwig B, Wilson E. Improving the Medication Administration Process: The Impact of Point of Care Bar Code Medication Scanning Technology. ASHP Best Practices Award in Health System Pharmacy. Bethesda, Md: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; 2003.
6. American Institute of Architects. Guidelines for design and construction of hospital and health care facilities (proposed 2005). Available at: http://www.aia.org/aah-gd_hospcons. Accessed February 1, 2005.
7. The Pebble Project. The Center for Health Design. Available at: http://www.healthdesign.org/research/pebble. Accessed February 1, 2005.
8. Designing the 21st Century Hospital: Serving Patients and Staff. Washington, DC: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The Center for Health Design; June 2004. Available at: www. rwjf.org/publications/publications Pdfs/design21CenturyHospital.pdf. Accessed February 1, 2005.
9. Lowers J. Improving quality through the built environment. Qual Letter. August 1999;8:2-9.
10. Bilchik G. A better place to heal. Health Forum J. 2002;46(3):10-15.
11. Hendrich AL, Fay J, Sorrells AK. Effects of acuity-adaptable rooms on flow of patients and delivery of care. Am J Crit Care. 2004;13(1):35-45.
12. Wellness LLC. The Wellness Room™ Pilot Study (2000). Available at: http://www.wellnessllc.com/titlescr.htm. Accessed February 1, 2005.
13. Hospitals discover cost efficiency of private rooms: new analysis reinforces advantages of private rooms. Exec Solut Healthc Manage. 2000;3(1): 7-8.
14. Hamilton D. Design for patient units. Healing by design: building for health care in the 21st century conference. McGill University Design Centre. September 20-21, 2000. Available at: www.muhc-healing.mcgill.ca/english/ Speakers/presen_l.html. Accessed February 1, 2005.
15. Coile R. Competing by design: healing environments attract patients, reduce costs and help recruit staff. Physician Exec. July-August 2002;4:12-16. Available at: http://www.findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m0843/is_4_28/ai_ 90317128. Accessed February 1, 2005.
16. Critical care update. Facil Design Manage. 1998;17(10):48-49.
17. McKesson Provider Technologies. A structured approach: how bronson healthcare group is building better health. Answers. 2004;12(1):2-5.