Contemporary gene flow and the spatio-temporal genetic structure of subdivided newt populations (Triturus cristatus, T. marmoratus)

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 619-628

  Jehle, R ^a   Wilson, G A ^b   Arntzen, J W ^c,d   Burke, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NATURALIS BIODIVERSITY CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d CENTRO DE INVESTIGAÇÃO EM BIODIVERSIDADE E RECURSOS GENÉTICOS   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Amphibians; Bayesian statistics; Effective population size; Gene flow; Metapopulation genetics; Microsatellites; Newts; Triturus

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA; PRIMER DNA;

GENE FLOW; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC STRUCTURE; METAPOPULATION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FRANCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HETEROZYGOTE; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; SALAMANDER;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; DNA PRIMERS; FRANCE; GENETICS, POPULATION; HETEROZYGOTE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SALAMANDRIDAE; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; WESTERN EUROPE; WORLD;

AMPHIBIA; AMPHIUMA MEANS; SALAMANDRIDAE; TRITURUS CRISTATUS; TRITURUS MARMORATUS;

EID: 18544383472     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00864.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aars, J. & Ims, R.A, 2000. Population dynamic and population genetic consequences of spatial density-dependent dispersal in patchy populations. Am. Nat. 155: 252-265.
2. Amarasekare, P. & Nisbet, R. 2001. Spatial heterogeneity, source-sink dynamics and the local coexistence of competing species. Am. Nat. 158: 572-584.
3. e) reveals genetic compensation in steelhead trout. Mol. Ecol. 12: 35-49.
4. Arntzen, J.W. & Hedlund, L. 1990. Fecundity of the newts Triturus cristatus, T. marmoratus and their natural hybrids in relation to species coexistence. Holarct. Ecol. 13: 325-332.
5. Arntzen, J.W. & Wallis, G. P. 1991. Restricted gene flow in a moving hybrid zone of the newts Triturus cristatus and T. marmoratus in western France. Evolution 45: 805-826.
6. Beaumont, M.A. & Rannala, B. 2004. The Bayesian revolution in genetics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5: 251-261.
7. Beerli, P. & Felsenstein, J. 2001. Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U S A 98: 4563-4568.
8. Begon, M. 1979. Estimating Animal Abundance. Capture-Recapture for Biologists. Eduard Arnold, London.
9. Bennetts, R.E., Nichols, J.D., Lebreton, J.D., Pradel, R., Hines, J.E. & Kitchens, W.M. 2001. Methods for estimating dispersal probabilities and related parameters using marked animals. In: Dispersal (J. Clobert, E. Danchin, A. A. Dhont & J. D. Nichols, eds), pp. 3-17. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. Bohonak, A.J. 2002. IBD (Isolation by Distance): a program for analysis of isolation by distance. J. Hered. 93: 153-154.
11. Bowne, D.R. & Bowers, M.A. 2004. Interpatch movements in spatially structured populations: a literature review. Landscape Ecol. 19: 1-20.
12. Castric, V. & Bernatchez, L. 2003. The rise and fall of isolation by distance in the anadromous brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill). Genetics 163: 983-996.
13. Charbonnel, N., Quesniot, M., Rzatavonjizay, R., Bremond, P. & Jarne, P. 2002. A spatial and temporal approach to micro-evolutionary forces affecting population biology in the freshwater snail Biomphalaria pfeifferi. Am. Nat. 160: 741-755.
14. Dias, P.C. 1996. Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 326-330.
15. Doncaster, C.P., Clobert, J., Doligez, B., Gustafsson, L. & Danchin, E. 1997. Balanced dispersal between spatially varying populations: an alternative to the source-sink model. Am. Nat. 150: 425-445.
16. Emery, A.M., Wilson, I.J., Craig, S., Boyle, P.R. & Noble, L.R. 2001. Assignment of paternity groups without access to parental genotypes: multiple mating and developmental plasticity in squid. Mol. Ecol. 10: 1265-1278.
17. Ewens, W.J. 1972. The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. Theor. Popul. Biol, 3: 87-112.
18. Gaggiotti, O.E. 2004. Multilocus genotype methods for the study of metapopulation processes. In: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution of Metapopulations (I. Hanski & O. E. Gaggiotti, eds), pp. 367-386. Elsevier Academic Press, London.
19. Gaggiotti, O.E., Jones, F., Lee, W.M., Amos, W., Harwood, J. & Nichols, R.A. 2002. Patterns of colonisation in a metapopulation of grey seals. Nature 416: 424-427.
20. Giles, B.E. & Goudet, J. 1997. Genetic differentiation in Silene dioica metapopulations: estimation of spatiotemporal effects in a successional plant species. Am. Nat. 149: 507-526.
21. Goudet, J. 1995. Fstat version 1.2: a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered. 86: 485-486.
22. Haag, C.R., Hottinger, J.W., Riek, M. & Ebert, D. 2002. Strong inbreeding depression in a Daphnia metapopulation. Evolution 56: 518-526.
23. Hanski, I. & Gaggiotti, O.E. (eds) 2004. Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution of Metapopulations. Elsevier Academic Press, London.
24. Hitchings, S.P. & Beebee, T.J.C. 1998. Loss of genetic diversity and fitness in common toad (Bufo bufo) populations isolated by inimical habitat. J. Evol. Biol. 11: 269-283.
25. Jehle, R. & Arntzen, J.W. 2000. Post-breeding migrations of newts (Triturus cristatus and T. marmoratus) with contrasting ecological requirements. J. Zool., Lond. 251: 297-306.
26. Jehle, R., Arntzen, J.W., Burke, T., Krupa, A. & Hödl, W. 2001. The annual number of breeding adults and the effective population size of syntopic newts (Triturus cristatus, T. marmoratus). Mol. Ecol. 10: 839-850.
27. Jehle, R., Burke, T. & Arntzen, J.W. in press. Delineating fine-scale genetic units in amphibians: probing the primacy of ponds. Conserv. Genet.
28. Jones, C.S., Noble, L.R., Jones, J.S., Tegelström, H., Triggs, G.S. & Berry, R.J. 1995. Differential male genetic success determines gene flow in an experimentally manipulated mouse population. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 260: 251-256.
29. Keller, L.F., Jeffrey, K.J., Arcese, P., Beaumont, M.A., Hochachka, W.M., Smith, J.N.M. & Bruford, M.W. 2001. Immigration and the ephemerality of a natural population bottleneck: evidence from molecular markers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 268: 1387-1394.
30. Krupa, A.P., Jehle, R., Dawson, D.A., Gentle, L.A., Gibbs, M., Arntzen, J.W. & Burke, T. 2002. Microsatellite loci in the crested newt (Triturus cristatus), and their utility in other newt taxa. Cons. Genet. 3: 87-89.
31. Kuussaari, M., Nieminen, M. & Hanski, I. 1996. An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia. J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 791-801.
32. Manel, S., Schwantz, M.K., Luikart, G. & Taberlet, P. 2003. Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 189-197.
33. McCauley, D.E., Richards, C.M., Emery, S.N., Smith, R.A. & McGlothin, J.W. 2001. The interaction of genetic and demographic processes in plant metapopulations: a case study of Silene alba. In: Integrating Ecology and Evolution in a Spatial Context (J. Silvertown & J. Antonovics, eds), pp. 177-196. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
34. Pannell, J.R. & Charlesworth, B. 2000. Effects of metapopulation processes on measures of genetic diversity. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 355: 1851-1864.
35. Perret, N., Pradel, R., Miaud, C., Grolet, O. & Joly, P. 2003. Transience, survival and dispersal rates in patchy newt populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 567-575.
36. Pritchard, J.K., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
37. Pulliam, H.R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132: 652-661.
38. Raymond, M. & Rousset, F. 1995. Genepop (Version 2.1): population genetic software for exact test and ecumenism. J. Hered. 86: 248-249.
39. Richards, C.M., Church, S. & McCauley, D.E. 1999. The influence of population size and isolation on gene flow by pollen in Silene alba. Evolution 53: 63-73.
40. Rousset, F. 2001. Genetic approaches to the estimation of dispersal rates. In: Dispersal (J. Clobert, E. Danchin, A. A. Dhont & J. D. Nichols, eds), pp. 18-28. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
41. Rowe, G., Beebee, T.J.C. & Burke, T. 2000. A microsatellite analysis of natterjack toad, Bufo calamita, metapopulations. Oikos 88: 641-651.
42. Saccheri, I., Kuussaari, M., Kankare, M., Vikman, P., Fortelius, W. & Hanski, I. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392: 491-494.
43. Scribner, K.T., Arntzen, J.W., Cruddace, N., Oldham, R.S. & Burke, T. 2001. Environmental correlates of toad abundance and population genetic diversity. Biol. Cons. 98: 201-210.
44. Vos, C.C., Antonisse-de Jong, A.G., Goedhart, P.W. & Smulders, M.J.M. 2001. Genetic similarity as a measure for connectivity between fragmented populations of the moor frog (Rana arvalis). Heredity 86: 598-608.
45. Wang, J. & Caballero, A. 1999. Developments in predicting the effective size of subdivided populations. Heredity 82: 212-226.
46. Wang, J. & Whitlock, M. 2003. Estimating effective population size and migration rates from genetic samples over space and time. Genetics 163: 429-446.
47. Watkinson, A.R. & Sutherland, W.J. 1995. Sources, sinks, and pseudosinks. J. Anim. Ecol. 64: 126-130.
48. Whitlock, M.C. 1992. Nonequilibrium population structure in forked fungus beetles: extinction, colonisation, and the genetic variance among populations. Am. Nat. 139: 952-970.
49. Whitlock, M.C. & Barton, N.H. 1997. The effective size of a subdivided population. Genetics 146: 427-441.
50. Wilson, G.A. & Rannala, B. 2003. Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163: 1177-1191.
51. Wright, S. 1969. Evolution and Genetics of Populations: The Theory of Gene Frequencies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.