The trouble with trivials (p > .05)

Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 143-144

  Sawilowsky, Shlomo S ^a   Yoon, Jina S ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Effect size; Meta analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 18544380847     PISSN: 15389472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.22237/jmasm/1020255600     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Carver, R. P. (1993). The case against statical significance testing, revisited. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 287-291.
2. nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
3. Cohen, J. J. (1994). The Earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
4. Hulburt, R. T. (1994). Comprehending behavioral statistics. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
5. Robinson, D. H., & Levin, J. R. (1997). Reflections on statistical and substantive significance, with a slice of replication. Educational Researcher, 26, 21-26.
6. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44, 1276-1284.
7. Shaver, J. P. (1993). What statistical significance testing is, and what it is not. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 293-316.
8. Thompson, B. (1996). AERA Editorial Policies regarding statistical significance testing: Three suggested reforms. Educational Researcher, 25, 26-30.
9. Thompson, B. (1999). Five methodology errors in educational research: A pantheon of statistical significance and other faux pas. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology, 5, 23-86.
10. Wilkinson, L., & The Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.