Mixed parallel-sequential-split schemes for time-stepping multiple physical parameterizations

Monthly Weather Review

Volumn 133, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 989-1002

  Dubal, Mark ^a   Wood, Nigel ^a   Staniforth, Andrew ^a  

^a MET OFFICE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DAMPING; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; OSCILLATIONS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

SPLITTING ERRORS; SYMMETRIZED-SPLITTING TECHNIQUE; TIME-STEPPING MULTIPLE PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; TRUNCATION ERRORS;

METEOROLOGY;

NUMERICAL METHOD; PARAMETERIZATION; WEATHER FORECASTING;

EID: 18544378856     PISSN: 00270644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/MWR2893.1     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Caya, A., R. Laprise, and P. Zwack, 1998: Consequences of using the splitting method for implementing physical forcings in a semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126, 1707-1713.
2. Cullen, M. J. P., and D. J. Salmond, 2003: On the use of a predictor-corrector scheme to couple the dynamics with the physical parametrizations in the ECMWF model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 1217-1236.
3. Dubal, M., N. Wood, and A. Staniforth, 2004: Analysis of parallel versus sequential splittings for time-stepping physical parameterizations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 121-132.
4. Durran, D. R., 1999: Numerical Methods for Wave Equations in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. 1st ed. Springer-Verlag, 465 pp.
5. Oran, E., and J. Boris, 1987: Numerical Simulation of Reactive Flow. 1st ed. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., 601 pp.
6. Reisner, J., A. Wyszogrodzki, V. Mousseau, and D. Knoll, 2003: An efficient physics-based preconditioner for the fully implicit solution of small-scale thermally driven atmospheric flows. J. Comput. Phys., 189, 30-44.
7. Sportisse, B., 2000: An analysis of operator splitting techniques in the stiff case. J. Comput. Phys., 161, 140-168.
8. Staniforth, A., N. Wood, and J. Côté, 2002a: Analysis of the numerics of physics-dynamics coupling. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 2779-2799.
9. Staniforth, A., N. Wood, and J. Côté, 2002b: A simple comparison of four physics-dynamics coupling schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 3129-3135.
10. Strang, G., 1968: On the construction and comparison of difference schemes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 5, 506-517.
11. Wedi, N. P., 1999: The numerical coupling of the physical parametrizations to the "dynamical" equations in a forecast model. ECMWF Tech. Memo. 274, 37 pp.
12. Williamson, D. L., 2002: Time-split versus process-split coupling of parameterizations and dynamical core. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 2024-2041.